ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
Seqping: gene prediction pipeline for plant genomes using self-training gene models and transcriptomic data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chromosome-level genome assembly of the sea cucumber, Colochirus anceps.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025Article
- An overview of computational methods for gene prediction in eukaryotes: strengths, limitations, and future directions.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Review
- Chromosome-level genome assembly of the butterfly hillstream loach Beaufortia pingi.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Chromosome-scale Elaeis guineensis and E. oleifera assemblies: comparative genomics of oil palm and other Arecaceae.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Multi-Omics Approaches in Oil Palm Research: A Comprehensive Review of Metabolomics, Proteomics, and Transcriptomics Based on Low-Temperature Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Unraveling the maternal and paternal origins of allotetraploid Vigna reflexo-pilosa.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The chromosome-scale genome assembly of cluster bean provides molecular insight into edible gum (galactomannan) biosynthesis family genes.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Lipid extract derived from newly isolatedComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Multi-Omics Approaches and Resources for Systems-Level Gene Function Prediction in the Plant Kingdom.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Genome assembly of the popular Korean soybean cultivar Hwangkeum.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Advances and perspectives in discovery and functional analysis of small secreted proteins in plants.Horticulture research · 2021Review
- DNA methylation changes in clonally propagated oil palm.Plant cell reports · 2020Article
- Whole genome analysis of Aspergillus sojae SMF 134 supports its merits as a starter for soybean fermentation.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2019Article
- Differential expression of heat shock and floral regulatory genes in pseudocarpel initials of mantled female inflorescences from Elaeis guineensis Jacq.Plant reproduction · 2019Article
- Article
- Long-Read Annotation: Automated Eukaryotic Genome Annotation Based on Long-Read cDNA Sequencing.Plant physiology · 2019Article
- Genomic Analysis of the Insect-Killing Fungus Beauveria bassiana JEF-007 as a Biopesticide.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- PalmXplore: oil palm gene database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- Evidence-based gene models for structural and functional annotations of the oil palm genome.Biology direct · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGene prediction is one of the most important steps in the genome annotation process. A large number of software tools and pipelines developed by various computing techniques are available for gene prediction. However, these systems have yet to accurately predict all or even most of the protein-coding regions. Furthermore, none of the currently available gene-finders has a universal Hidden Markov Model (HMM) that can perform gene prediction for all organisms equally well in an automatic fashion.
resultsWe present an automated gene prediction pipeline, Seqping that uses self-training HMM models and transcriptomic data. The pipeline processes the genome and transcriptome sequences of the target species using GlimmerHMM, SNAP, and AUGUSTUS pipelines, followed by MAKER2 program to combine predictions from the three tools in association with the transcriptomic evidence. Seqping generates species-specific HMMs that are able to offer unbiased gene predictions. The pipeline was evaluated using the Oryza sativa and Arabidopsis thaliana genomes. Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) analysis showed that the pipeline was able to identify at least 95% of BUSCO's plantae dataset. Our evaluation shows that Seqping was able to generate better gene predictions compared to three HMM-based programs (MAKER2, GlimmerHMM and AUGUSTUS) using their respective available HMMs. Seqping had the highest accuracy in rice (0.5648 for CDS, 0.4468 for exon, and 0.6695 nucleotide structure) and A. thaliana (0.5808 for CDS, 0.5955 for exon, and 0.8839 nucleotide structure).
conclusionsSeqping provides researchers a seamless pipeline to train species-specific HMMs and predict genes in newly sequenced or less-studied genomes. We conclude that the Seqping pipeline predictions are more accurate than gene predictions using the other three approaches with the default or available HMMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.