Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28466682›Full record

ArticleCognition & emotion2018

Non-response to sad mood induction: implications for emotion research.

Jonathan Rottenberg, Maria Kovacs, Ilya Yaroslavsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition & emotion, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Does Mood Affect Judgment: Results from an In Vivo Observational Study.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Emotions in simulation-based education: friends or foes of learning?Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan Rottenberga Department of Psychology , University of South Florida , Tampa , FL , USA.
Maria Kovacsb Department of Psychiatry , University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
Ilya Yaroslavskyc Department of Psychology , Cleveland State University , Cleveland , OH , USA.

Funding

Biobehavioral Inflexibility and Risk for Juvenile-Onset DepressionR01MH084938 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KOVACS, MARIA · 2009 to 2024
$7.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental induction of sad mood states is a mainstay of laboratory research on affect and cognition, mood regulation, and mood disorders. Typically, the success of such mood manipulations is reported as a statistically significant pre- to post-induction change in the self-rated intensity of the target affect. The present commentary was motivated by an unexpected finding in one of our studies concerning the response rate to a well-validated sad mood induction. Using the customary statistical approach, we found a significant mean increase in self-rated sadness intensity with a moderate effect size, verifying the "success" of the mood induction. However, that "success" masked that, between one-fifth and about one-third of our samples (adolescents who had histories of childhood-onset major depressive disorder and healthy controls) reported absolutely no sadness in response to the mood induction procedure. We consider implications of our experience for emotion research by (1) commenting upon the typically overlooked phenomenon of nonresponse, (2) suggesting changes in reporting practices regarding mood induction success, and (3) outlining future directions to help scientists determine why some subjects do not respond to experimental mood induction.

Indexed as

EmotionsHumansPsychological TechniquesSadnessadolescentsdepressionemotion reactivitynonresponseSad mood induction

Identifiers

PMID28466682
PMCPMC6174537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.