Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28466667›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of immunopathology and pharmacology2017

Side effects and their impact on the success of milk oral immunotherapy (OIT) in children.

Francesca Mori, Antonella Cianferoni, Alice Brambilla, Simona Barni, Lucrezia Sarti, Neri Pucci, Maurizio de Martino, Elio Novembre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Taste aversion and adverse events contribute equally to OIT discontinuation in children: A real-world multi-allergen analysis.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Observational
  2. Real-world experience: a retrospective pediatric chart review to determine why patients and caregivers discontinue oral immunotherapy.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Eosinophilic esophagitis during sublingual and oral allergen immunotherapy.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesca Mori1 Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatric, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Antonella Cianferoni2 Allergy and Immunology Division, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alice Brambilla1 Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatric, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Simona Barni1 Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatric, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Lucrezia Sarti1 Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatric, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Neri Pucci1 Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatric, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Maurizio de Martino3 Department of Pediatric, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Elio Novembre1 Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatric, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Meyer Children's Hospital · ITChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has been introduced as a new immune-modulating treatment under investigation for food allergies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the success of OIT in a cohort of children with milk allergy. These children underwent OIT in a clinical practice and were followed for up to ten years. The secondary endpoint was to describe the main adverse events during OIT and compare them to those reported in the literature. Eighty-two milk-allergic children started OIT. According to the OIT endpoint reached after one year, all of the children enrolled in the study were divided into four groups: complete desensitization; partial desensitization; step down; and stop groups. Any adverse events that occurred during OIT were also recorded. Of the 82 patients, eight were recruited in the last months of 2010 so they were still ongoing at the end of the study. For that reason, they were excluded from the analysis. The majority (73%) of the 74 children evaluated (51 boys, 23 girls; median age, 7 years; age range, 2-18 years; specific serum IgE for cow's milk, 36 KUA/L [range, 3-100 KUA/L]; milk SPT wheal diameter, 7 mm [range, 2-15 mm]) reached complete (58.1%) or partial (14.9%) desensitization, 9.4% were subjected to step down. The remaining 17.6% of the children discontinued OIT because of the occurrence of chronic gastroenteric (GE) symptoms (46.1%) or acute asthma (15.3%) following milk intake. In agreement with the literature, we found that chronic GE symptoms was the main reason for OIT discontinuation. OIT represents a valid tool for the treatment of food allergies in children; however, the risk of potential adverse reactions, both IgE- and non-IgE-mediated, should be discussed with parents prior to the initiation of OIT.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolDesensitization, ImmunologicFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin EMaleMilkMilk HypersensitivityTreatment OutcomeImmunoglobulin Easthmachildrendesensitizationeosinophilic esophagitisgastroenteric symptomsmilk allergyoral immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28466667
PMCPMC5806791
OpenAlexW2611846499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.