Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28466463›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2017

Circulating bile acids predict outcome in critically ill patients.

Thomas Horvatits, Andreas Drolz, Karoline Rutter, Kevin Roedl, Lies Langouche, Greet Van den Berghe, Günter Fauler, Brigitte Meyer, Martin Hülsmann, Gottfried Heinz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas HorvatitsDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas DrolzDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karoline RutterDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kevin RoedlDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lies LangoucheClinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Greet Van den BergheClinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Günter FaulerClinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Brigitte Meyer5th Medical Department, Kaiser Franz Josef Spital - SMZ Süd, Vienna, Austria.
Martin HülsmannDivision of Cardiology, Department Internal Medicine 2, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gottfried HeinzDivision of Cardiology, Department Internal Medicine 2, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael TraunerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Valentin FuhrmannDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. v.fuhrmann@uke.de.
Medical University of Vienna · ATKU Leuven · BEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEKaiser-Franz-Josef-Spital · ATMedical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJaundice and cholestatic hepatic dysfunction are frequent findings in critically ill patients associated with increased mortality. Cholestasis in critically ill patients is closely associated with stimulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines resulting in impaired bile secretion and subsequent accumulation of bile acids. Aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical role of circulating bile acids in critically ill patients.

methodsTotal and individual serum bile acids were assessed via high-performance liquid chromatography in 320 critically ill patients and 19 controls.

resultsTotal serum bile acids were threefold higher in septic than cardiogenic shock patients and sixfold higher than in post-surgical patients or controls (p < 0.001). Elevated bile acid levels correlated with severity of illness, renal dysfunction and inflammation (p < 0.05). Total bile acids predicted 28-day mortality independently of sex, age, serum bilirubin and severity of illness (HR 1.041, 95% CI 1.013-1.071, p < 0.005). Best prediction of mortality of total bile acids was seen in patients suffering from septic shock.

conclusionsIndividual and total BAs are elevated by various degrees in different shock conditions. BAs represent an early predictor of short-term survival in a mixed cohort of ICU patients and may serve as marker for early risk stratification in critically ill patients. Future studies should elucidate whether modulation of BA metabolism and signalling influences the clinical course and outcome in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Bile acidsCardiogenic shockCholestasisCritically ill patientsICUSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID28466463
PMCPMC5413465
OpenAlexW2611140688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.