Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28466461›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2017

High-flow nasal cannula to prevent postextubation respiratory failure in high-risk non-hypercapnic patients: a randomized multicenter trial.

Rafael Fernandez, Carles Subira, Fernando Frutos-Vivar, Gemma Rialp, Cesar Laborda, Joan Ramon Masclans, Amanda Lesmes, Luna Panadero, Gonzalo Hernandez

6 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01820507 naterminatednot on this map

Prevention of Post-extubation Respiratory Failure in High Risk Patients by High-flow Conditioned Oxygen Therapy Versus Standard Oxygen Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlthaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de ManresaRan2013 to 2015Enrolled155ConditionsRespiratory FailureArmsOptiflow (Fisher&Paykel), Nasal cannulae or controlled oxygen concentration mask
NCT03282552 nacompletednot on this map

High Flow Oxygen Therapy Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Cardiac Surgery Patients-OPTICAR Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensRan2017 to 2019Enrolled99ConditionsHypoxemic Respiratory FailureArmsNasal Cannula High Flow Oxygen
NCT03334227 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy as an Adjuvant in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis. A Multicenter Parallel-group Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlthaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de ManresaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled39ConditionsSevere SepsisArmsHigh-Flow nasal cannula (HFNC)
NCT04711759 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Postextubation High-flow Nasal Cannula Versus Standard Oxygen Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: a Physiologic Randomized Crossover Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2021 to 2022Enrolled26ConditionsVentilator WeaningArmsHigh flow nasal cannula, Standard oxygen therapy
NCT04934163 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Flow Rates of Postextubation High-flow Nasal Cannula on Extubation Outcome: An Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled180ConditionsHypoxemic Respiratory FailureArmsFlow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 60L/min), Flow rate setting of high-flow nasal cannula (initially 40L/min)
NCT06746363 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of High-flow Nasal Cannula After Extubation in Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled110ConditionsPost Extubation Respiratory Failure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Noninvasive respiratory support after extubation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Temporal trends in post-extubation respiratory management and reintubation risk factors in Japan: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rafael FernandezCritical Care Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu- Fundacio Althaia, CIBERES, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Dr Joan Soler 1, 08243, Manresa, Spain. rfernandezf@althaia.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5711-5317
Carles SubiraCritical Care Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu- Fundacio Althaia, CIBERES, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Dr Joan Soler 1, 08243, Manresa, Spain.
Fernando Frutos-VivarCIBERES, Hospital de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Gemma RialpHospital Son Llatzer, Majorca, Spain.
Cesar LabordaHospital Valle Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan Ramon MasclansHospital del Mar, CIBERES, IMIM, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.
Amanda LesmesCIBERES, Hospital de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Luna PanaderoCIBERES, Hospital de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Gonzalo HernandezHospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
Hospital Universitario de Getafe · ESUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya · ESHospital Son Llatzer · ESHospital Virgen de la Salud · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtubation failure is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but cannot be safely predicted or avoided. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) prevents postextubation respiratory failure in low-risk patients.

objectiveTo demonstrate that HFNC reduces postextubation respiratory failure in high-risk non-hypercapnic patients compared with conventional oxygen.

methodsRandomized, controlled multicenter trial in patients who passed a spontaneous breathing trial. We enrolled patients meeting criteria for high-risk of failure to randomly receive HFNC or conventional oxygen for 24 h after extubation. Primary outcome was respiratory failure within 72-h postextubation. Secondary outcomes were reintubation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, and mortality. Statistical analysis included multiple logistic regression models.

resultsThe study was stopped due to low recruitment after 155 patients were enrolled (78 received high-flow and 77 received conventional oxygen). Groups were similar at enrollment, and all patients tolerated 24-h HFNC. Postextubation respiratory failure developed in 16 (20%) HFNC patients and in 21 (27%) conventional patients [OR 0.69 (0.31-1.54), p = 0.2]. Reintubation was needed in 9 (11%) HFNC patients and in 12 (16%) conventional patients [OR 0.71 (0.25-1.95), p = 0.5]. No difference was found in ICU or hospital length of stay, or mortality. Logistic regression models suggested HFNC [OR 0.43 (0.18-0.99), p = 0.04] and cancer [OR 2.87 (1.04-7.91), p = 0.04] may be independently associated with postextubation respiratory failure.

conclusionOur study is inconclusive as to a potential benefit of HFNC over conventional oxygen to prevent occurrence of respiratory failure in non-hypercapnic patients at high risk for extubation failure. Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01820507.

Indexed as

High-flow oxygenMechanical ventilationReintubationWeaning

Identifiers

PMID28466461
PMCPMC5413462
OpenAlexW2611511676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.