ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2017
[Renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarkers for prediction of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2018Pooled it
- High bicarbonate replacement fluid and time to pH normalization during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation: a retrospective single-center cohort study.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Sepsis: early interventions count but not RRT!Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- [Life after Acute Kidney Injury : Long-term consequences and implications for clinical practice].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017Review
- Hemofiltration induces generation of leukocyte-derived CD31+/CD41- microvesicles in sepsis.Annals of intensive care · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury is still a common complication in intensive care units and is associated with a significantly increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Various treatment concepts, like continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT) or (modified) intermittent procedures, as well as different methods of anticoagulation and the general decision of when and if to initiate RRT have to be considered by the treating physician. While giving vital input on when to initiate RRT, the German ELAIN (Early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients) trial and the French AKIKI (The artificial kidney initiation in kidney injury) trial raised many more questions. Currently in its recruiting phase, the STARRT-AKI (Standard versus accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury) trial is designed to hopefully give a definitive statement. Due to a planned recruiting phase until 2019, results are expected in 2020 at the earliest. Regarding the termination of RRT, recurring diuresis of more than 450 ml/24 h is a good indicator for recovery of renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.