Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28466290›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2017

[Evaluation of care conditions in intensive care units : Results of an online questionnaire of critical care nurses].

M Isfort

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Working conditions in German intensive care units-A cross-professional analysis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Influence of nurses on the experience of noninvasive ventilation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Review
  8. [Between care for others and self-care: intensive care nursing in times of the COVID-19 pandemic].Ethik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin · 2021
    Article
  9. [Impact of nursing staff shortage on intensive care medicine capacity in Germany].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
    Article
  10. [Organ assist devices in the future : Limits and perspectives].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution.

M IsfortDeutsches Institut für angewandte Pflegeforschung e.V., Hülchrather Straße 15, 50670, Köln, Deutschland. m.isfort@dip.de.
Deutsche Institut für angewandte Pflegeforschung e.V.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the following article, selected results of a descriptive study on personnel staffing and patients' care in intensive care units in Germany are presented and discussed. The main focus is laid on comparing features of personnel staffing with indicators of job satisfaction and patients' care. The study is based on an online questionnaire of critical care nurses run in 2017. The article represents the data of 2233 included German critical care nurses. The main results are the following: a low nurse patient ratio (≥1:3) in intensive care units has the tendency to cause higher risks in patients' care and shows lower job satisfaction than nurses with higher nurse-patient ratio (≤1:2).

Indexed as

Critical CareIntensive Care UnitsNursing Staff, HospitalGermanyHumansJob SatisfactionPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingSurveys and QuestionnairesHospitalsJob satisfactionNursing staffPatient safetyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID28466290
OpenAlexW2610432826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.