Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28466154›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2017

Spinal cord constraints in the era of high-precision radiotherapy : Retrospective analysis of 62 spinal/paraspinal lesions with possible infringements of spinal cord constraints within a minimal volume.

Sebastian Zschaeck, Peter Wust, Reinhold Graf, Waldemar Wlodarczyk, Reinhard Schild, Alexander Henry Thieme, Mirko Weihrauch, Volker Budach, Pirus Ghadjar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. New clinical data on human spinal cord re-irradiation tolerance.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  5. Repeat reirradiation of the spinal cord: multi-national expert treatment recommendations.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sebastian ZschaeckKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Centrum Tumormedizin CC14, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. Sebastian.Zschaeck@charite.de.
Peter WustKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Centrum Tumormedizin CC14, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Reinhold GrafKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Centrum Tumormedizin CC14, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Waldemar WlodarczykKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Centrum Tumormedizin CC14, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Reinhard SchildKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Centrum Tumormedizin CC14, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander Henry ThiemeKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Centrum Tumormedizin CC14, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Mirko WeihrauchKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Centrum Tumormedizin CC14, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Volker BudachKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Centrum Tumormedizin CC14, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Pirus GhadjarKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Centrum Tumormedizin CC14, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCurrent constraints aim to minimize the risk of radiation myelitis by the use of restrictive maximal spinal cord doses, commonly 50 Gy. However, several studies suggested that a dose-volume effect could exist. Based on these observations, we evaluated patients receiving potentially excessive doses to the spinal cord within minimal volumes. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients receiving radiotherapy between June 2010 and May 2015 using the Novalis

resultsAccording to different dose evaluation approaches (spinal canal, spinal cord contour), 16 and 10 out of 31 primary irradiated lesions infringed constraints. For the 16 lesions violating spinal canal doses, the maximum doses ranged from 50.5 to 61.9 Gy EQD2. Reirradiated lesions had an average and median cumulative dose of 70.5 and 69 Gy, respectively. Dose drop-off was steep in both groups. Median overall survival was 17 months. No radiation myelitis or radiomorphological alterations were observed during follow-up.

conclusionThis study adds to the increasing body of evidence indicating that excessive spinal cord doses within a minimal volume, especially in a reirradiation setting with topographically distinct high-point doses, may be given to patients after careful evaluation of treatment- and tumor-associated risks.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyelitisRadiation DosageRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgeryRe-IrradiationRetrospective StudiesSpinal CanalSpinal CordMyelitisMyelopathyRadiosurgeryReirradiationToxicity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.