Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28466105›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2017

[Headache in the emergency department].

C J Schankin, A Straube, C L Bassetti, U Fischer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C J SchankinNeurologische Klinik, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz. christoph.schankin@insel.ch.
A StraubeNeurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Großhadern, München, Deutschland.
C L BassettiNeurologische Klinik, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz.
U FischerNeurologische Klinik, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Headache is one of the most frequent symptoms leading to visits at the emergency department. Here, we aim at presenting a pragmatic algorithm for headache patients at the emergency department. The basic principle is taking a detailed history of the current headache with a focus on dynamics, phenotype and trigger factors as well as a possible preexisting headache. "Red flags" should be interrogated specifically. Hypotheses of the etiology of the headache should be generated in combination with the clinical examination (vital signs, neurological exam, otorhinolaryngological and ophthalmological exams) and should be tested appropriately with imaging, laboratory, cerebral spinal fluid studies and ultrasound. Secondary headache have to be treated with a causal approach, if necessary also symptomatically. When a secondary headache can be excluded, we recommend aiming for a primary headache diagnosis with subsequent specific therapy. When a headache patient can be discharged, we recommend scheduling a follow-up appointment to understand the development of a secondary headache and its cause. In case of a primary headache, optimizing prophylaxis and acute therapy is important to prevent future emergency department visits.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalDiagnosis, DifferentialEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalHeadacheHumansPhysical ExaminationAlgorithmEmergencyLeading symptomOutpatient follow-upWarning signs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.