ArticleWorld journal of diabetes2017
KMAP-O framework for care management research of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Article in World journal of diabetes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of health belief education on metabolic indices of patients with diabetes type II living in rural areas.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- The influence of patient-centered communication on psychological distress: the chain mediating role of health-related self-efficacy and healthy lifestyle behaviors and the moderating role of social media use.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Pioglitazone and barriers to effective post-stroke comorbidity management in stroke survivors with diabetes.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2024Article
- Factors Correlated with Practices Regarding Care of Dengue Patients Among Nurses from 94 Primary Care Units in a High- Risk Province in Southern Thailand.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Need for an Artificial Intelligence-based Diabetes Care Management System in India and the United States.Health services research and managerial epidemiologyArticle
- A Proposed Multi-Criteria Optimization Approach to Enhance Clinical Outcomes Evaluation for Diabetes Care: A Commentary.Health services research and managerial epidemiologyArticle
- Predictive Analytics for the KMAP-O Model in Design and Evaluation of Diabetes Care Management Research.Health services research and managerial epidemiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo review impacts of interventions involving self-management education, health coaching, and motivational interviewing for type 2 diabetes.
methodsA thorough review of the scientific literature on diabetes care and management was executed by a research team.
resultsThis article summarizes important findings in regard to the validity of developing a comprehensive behavioral system as a framework for empirical investigation. The behavioral system framework consists of patients' knowledge (K), motivation (M), attitude (A), and practice (P) as predictor variables for diabetes care outcomes (O). Care management strategies or health education programs serve as the intervention variable that directly influences K, M, A, and P and then indirectly affects the variability in patient care outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes.
conclusionThis review contributes to the understanding of the KMAP-O framework and how it can guide the care management of patients with type 2 diabetes. It will allow the tailoring of interventions to be more effective through knowledge enhancement, increased motivation, attitudinal changes, and improved preventive practice to reduce the progression of type 2 diabetes and comorbidities. Furthermore, the use of health information technology for enhancing changes in KMAP and communications is advocated in health promotion and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.