Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28465770›Full record

ArticleAmerican health & drug benefits2016

Effects of Specialty Pharmacy Care on Health Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis.

Jun Tang, James Bailey, Cyril Chang, Richard Faris, Song Hee Hong, Michael Levin, Junling Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American health & drug benefits, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factors associated with delays in multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy initiation.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jun TangHealth Economics Analyst, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
James BaileyProfessor, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center.
Cyril ChangProfessor, Department of Economics, University of Memphis, TN.
Richard FarisAdjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center.
Song Hee HongProfessor, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Korea.
Michael LevinProfessor, Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, and Chief, Department of Neurology, Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, TN.
Junling WangProfessor, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · USNew Generation University College · ETUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasingly, third-party payers are requiring patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) to participate in specialty pharmacy management programs to improve their adherence to their prescribed medications. The effects of specialty pharmacy care on MS clinical outcomes have not yet been comprehensively examined in the literature.

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of specialty pharmacy care and usual community pharmacy care MS outcomes.

methodsInpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy claims for patients with MS were extracted from a major national pharmacy benefit management company's databases for this retrospective cohort study. Enrollees with continuous medical and pharmacy benefits were followed for 3 years. MS relapse status was defined by a specific algorithm and was compared in patients who had specialty pharmacy care and those with usual community pharmacy care. The outcome measures included time to the first and second disease relapses and the number of relapses. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed on the time to first and second relapses, and generalized linear regression models were performed on the number of disease relapses.

resultsThe study cohort included 1731 eligible patients with MS, of whom 1427 received specialty pharmacy care. During the study period, between 2006 and 2009, 1634 relapses were identified, with a mean annual relapse rate of 0.3 among the specialty pharmacy care group versus 0.4 among the usual pharmacy care group. Specialty pharmacy care was associated with a lower risk for disease relapse, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.607-0.871) for the first relapse and HR of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.610-1.002) for the second relapse. When controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and index medications, specialty pharmacy care was associated with a lower risk for disease relapse with HR of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.680-0.985) for first relapse versus usual pharmacy care. The time to second relapse was not significantly different between the 2 groups in the unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression models. In addition, a generalized linear regression model showed that specialty pharmacy care, index age, geographic North region, 3-year Chronic Disease Score, and Elixhauser comorbidity measure were significantly associated with the number of disease relapses.

conclusionThese results show that specialty pharmacy care is associated with a significantly lower risk for disease relapse in patients with MS (specifically the first relapse) and fewer relapses compared with usual community pharmacy care.

Indexed as

Chronic Disease Scoreclinical outcomescomorbiditydisease relapsegeneralized linear regression modelmultiple sclerosispharmacy benefit managementspecialty pharmacy managementthird-party payersusual pharmacy care

Identifiers

PMID28465770
PMCPMC5394553
OpenAlexW2550016028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.