ArticleAmerican health & drug benefits2017
Comparing Healthcare Costs Associated with Oral and Subcutaneous Methotrexate or Biologic Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States.
Article in American health & drug benefits, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Attitudes of healthcare professionals towards the use of parenteral methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Microneedle Technology in Psoriasis Management: Mechanistic Insights, Technological Innovation, Clinical Progress, and Challenges.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Article
- Should All Patients Trial Subcutaneous Methotrexate Prior to Commencing Biologic Therapy? A Real World Study.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2024Article
- Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Review
- Biologics Initiation in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Race and Ethnicity: Results From a Randomized Survey Study.ACR open rheumatology · 2023Article
- A strategy to identify event specific hospitalizations in large health claims databases.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Pharmacoeconomic analysis of biologics and methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis from the standpoint of the number needed to treat concept under the Japanese health insurance system.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2022Article
- Naloxone and Buprenorphine Prescribing Following US Emergency Department Visits for Suspected Opioid Overdose: August 2019 to April 2021.Annals of emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Abdominal vagus nerve stimulation alleviates collagen-induced arthritis in rats.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- MTX optimization or adding bDMARD equally improve disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the prospective study STRATEGE.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- The Pretreatment Gut Microbiome Is Associated With Lack of Response to Methotrexate in New-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization and Cost Burden Assessment for Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis in the United States.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Pharmacomicrobiology of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Gut Microbiome as Predictor of Therapeutic Response.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Potential Benefits of the Self-Administration of Subcutaneous Methotrexate with Autoinjector Devices for Patients: A Review.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2021Review
- Economic Burden of Switching to Different Biologic Therapies Among Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor-Experienced Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2019Article
- Illuminating an Invisible Epidemic: A Systemic Review of the Clinical and Economic Benefits of Early Diagnosis and Treatment in Inflammatory Disease and Related Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Delayed Treatment Acceleration in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Inadequate Response to Initial Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: Data from the Corrona Registry.American health & drug benefits · 2018Article
- Update on subcutaneous methotrexate for inflammatory arthritis and psoriasis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018Review
- Comparing Healthcare Costs Associated with Oral and Subcutaneous Methotrexate or Biologic Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States.American health & drug benefits · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethotrexate (MTX) is the primary disease-modifying antirheumatic drug used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Optimizing the use of oral and subcutaneous MTX may delay the use of expensive biologic therapies; the effect of such a delay on overall medical costs is currently unknown.
objectiveTo compare the 5-year healthcare costs of treatment pathways for patients with RA who initiate oral MTX in the United States.
methodsWe identified patients with RA in the Symphony Health Solutions database (Integrated Dataverse) who initiated treatment with oral MTX in 2009 and had RA-related claims for each year through 2014. We then grouped the patients into 4 treatment cohorts, including those who (1) continued to use oral MTX, (2) switched to subcutaneous MTX, (3) switched to subcutaneous MTX and then added or switched to a biologic therapy, and (4) added or switched to a biologic therapy. The costs (in 2015 US dollars) for pharmaceuticals, office visits, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits were estimated for each cohort.
resultsOf the total 35,640 patients in this study, 15,599 patients continued to use oral MTX, with an average cost of $47,464 per patient in the full study period; 1802 patients switched to subcutaneous MTX, with an average per-patient cost of $59,058; 711 patients switched to subcutaneous MTX and then added or switched to a biologic agent, with an average per-patient cost of $175,391 and a mean time to a biologic use of 1184 days; and 17,528 patients added or switched to a biologic from oral MTX, with an average per-patient cost of $212,595 and a mean time to a biologic use of 478 days. Biologic treatments were responsible for the cost differences between the cohorts; the nondrug costs were similar across the groups.
conclusionOur findings that patients who switched to subcutaneous MTX incurred lower costs than patients who only used oral MTX before using biologics may provide useful information for patients and providers who are choosing between continued MTX use and adding or switching to a biologic based on treatment guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28465768PMC5394544W2589479946What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.