ArticleScientific reports2017
Analysis of biofilm bacterial communities under different shear stresses using size-fractionated sediment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns of Functional Redundancy and Anaerobic Metabolic Potential Characterise the Skin Microbiome of a Critically Endangered Sawfish.Environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Archaeal and Bacterial Communities and Their Relations with Hydrochemistry in Gongzhu Co, a Carbon-Poor, Nutrient-Rich Basin Lake of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Microbial Selection and Functional Adaptation in Technical Snow: A Molecular Perspective from 16S rRNA Profiling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Shear stress controls prokaryotic and eukaryotic biofilm communities together with EPS and metabolomic expression in a semi-controlled coastal environment in the NW Mediterranean Sea.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Metal-oxide precipitation influences microbiome structure in hyporheic zones receiving acid rock drainage.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Disturbance frequency directs microbial community succession in marine biofilms exposed to shear.mSphere · 2023Article
- Influence of Hydrodynamic Forces on Electroactive Bacterial Adhesion in Microbial Fuel Cell Anodes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Geography, taxonomy, and ecological guild: Factors impacting freshwater macroinvertebrate gut microbiomes.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Trace Metal Contamination Impacts Predicted Functions More Than Structure of Marine Prokaryotic Biofilm Communities in an Anthropized Coastal Area.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Live Cell Analysis of Shear Stress on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using an Automated Higher-Throughput Microfluidic System.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microorganisms are ubiquitous in aqueous environments and are crucial for biogeochemical processes, but their community structures and functions remain poorly understood. In this paper, a rotating reactor was designed to study the effects of substrata and flow conditions on sediment bacterial communities using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, assaying three groups of size-fractionated sediments and three different levels of applied shear stress. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes were the dominant phyla of the microbial communities, with more anaerobic bacteria and opportunistic pathogens being detected under static water conditions, while more aerobic bacteria were detected under dynamic water flow conditions. Most of the top 10 genera were present in all the samples; however, there were significant differences in the species abundance. Paludibacter and Comamonadaceae_unclassified were the most abundant genera under static and dynamic conditions, respectively. Under static water conditions, the medium-grained sediment had the highest microbial diversity, followed by the fine and coarse sediments. Under dynamic water flow conditions, a higher flow velocity corresponded to a greater microbial diversity. Overall, there was no significant difference in the community richness or diversity between the static and dynamic water flow conditions. This study is beneficial for further understanding the heterogeneities of microbial communities in natural aquatic ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.