Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28465563›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Comparative authentication of Hypericum perforatum herbal products using DNA metabarcoding, TLC and HPLC-MS.

Ancuta Cristina Raclariu, Ramona Paltinean, Laurian Vlase, Aurélie Labarre, Vincent Manzanilla, Mihael Cristin Ichim, Gianina Crisan, Anne Krag Brysting, Hugo de Boer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Quality Consistency of Herbal Products: Chemical Evaluation.Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Identification of compounds from chufa (Food science & nutrition · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. DNA-Based Herbal Teas' Authentication: An ITS2 andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ancuta Cristina RaclariuNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Ramona PaltineanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Haţieganu", Faculty of Pharmacy, Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 23, 400337, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Laurian VlaseDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ion Creanga Street, 8-10, 400010, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Aurélie LabarreNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Vincent ManzanillaNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Mihael Cristin IchimNIRDBS/"Stejarul" Research Centre for Biological Sciences, Alexandru cel Bun Street, 6, 610004, Piatra, Neamt, Romania.
Gianina CrisanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Haţieganu", Faculty of Pharmacy, Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 23, 400337, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Anne Krag BrystingDepartment of Biosciences, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066 Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway.
Hugo de BoerNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway. hugo.deboer@nhm.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1985-7859

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many herbal products have a long history of use, but there are increasing concerns over product efficacy, safety and quality in the wake of recent cases exposing discrepancies between labeling and constituents. When it comes to St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) herbal products, there is limited oversight, frequent off-label use and insufficient monitoring of adverse drug reactions. In this study, we use amplicon metabarcoding (AMB) to authenticate 78 H. perforatum herbal products and evaluate its ability to detect substitution compared to standard methods using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Hypericum perforatum was detected in 68% of the products using AMB. Furthermore, AMB detected incongruence between constituent species and those listed on the label in all products. Neither TLC nor HPLC-MS could be used to unambiguously identify H. perforatum. They are accurate methods for authenticating presence of the target compounds, but have limited efficiency in detecting infrageneric substitution and do not yield any information on other plant ingredients in the products. Random post-marketing AMB of herbal products by regulatory agencies could raise awareness among consumers of substitution and would provide an incentive to manufacturers to increase quality control from raw ingredients to commercialized products.

Indexed as

Quality ControlChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, Thin LayerDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHumansHypericumMass SpectrometryPlant ExtractsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID28465563
PMCPMC5431008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.