ArticleScientific reports2017
Invisible body illusion modulates interpersonal space.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baby face enlarges perceived reachable space.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Social exclusion increases interpersonal distance through need threat: buffering and amplifying roles of social identification and rejection sensitivity.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- An embodied perspective: Angular gyrus and precuneus decode selfhood in memories of naturalistic events.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Bodily self-recognition in patients with pathological embodiment.Journal of neuroscience research · 2022Article
- Wearing a Mask Shapes Interpersonal Space during COVID-19 Pandemic.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Perceptual illusion of body-ownership within an immersive realistic environment enhances memory accuracy and re-experiencing.iScience · 2022Article
- The physiological correlates of interpersonal space.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Peri-personal space as a prior in coupling visual and proprioceptive signals.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Frontier of Self and Impact Prediction.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interpersonal space (e.g., IPS) refers to the physical distance individuals maintain from others during social interactions, and into which intrusion by others can cause discomfort. Here, we asked whether the size of IPS is affected by manipulation of one's own body representation. To address this issue, in Experiment 1, IPS was measured through a comfort-distance task, before and after eliciting the illusion of owning an invisible body. To rule out a general, nonspecific change in space perception consequent the illusion, we also assessed peripersonal space, e.g., PPS, the area around the body used to act on nearby objects, through a reaching-distance task. Results showed that the experience of invisibility induces a selective contraction of IPS, without affecting the perceived reaching space around the body. In Experiment 2, a tool-use manipulation produced the opposite dissociation, modifying the boundaries of PPS, but leaving IPS distance unaltered. Collectively, these findings support a close relationship between IPS and the conscious representation of the body external appearance, i.e. the body image, and suggest the existence of two functionally separate representations of the space immediately surrounding the body in humans, which may form the basis of distinct processes engaged for different behavioural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.