Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2017
Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel on Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01894789 (ComPArison of the Effect of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel on Myocardial Blood Flow), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ComPArison of the Effect of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel on Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF) and Reserve (MBFR) Measured With Positron Emission TomograpHy (PET) in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): The PATH Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of a single ultra processed meal on myocardial endothelial function, adenosine mediated effects and cognitive performances.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- A Review of the Role of the Antiplatelet Drug Ticagrelor in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Thrombotic Disease, and Other Diseases.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022Review
- The potential of regional myocardial blood flow measurement with SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Assessing therapeutic efficacy in coronary artery disease with SPECT myocardial blood flow.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- The potential for PET-guided revascularization of coronary artery disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTicagrelor is a P2Y METHODS AND
resultsThis randomized double-blinded crossover study included 22 patients who received therapeutic interventions of ticagrelor 90 mg orally twice a day for 10 days and clopidogrel 75 mg orally once a day for 10 days, with a washout period of at least 10 days between the treatments. Global and regional MBF and myocardial flow reserve were measured using rubidium 82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography at baseline and during intermediate- and high-dose adenosine. Global MBF was significantly greater with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (1.28±0.55 versus 1.13±0.47 mL/min per gram,
conclusionsTicagrelor potentiates global and regional adenosine-induced MBF increases in patients with stable coronary artery disease. This effect may contribute to the incremental mortality benefit compared with clopidogrel. CLINICAL
trial registrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01894789.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.