Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28465261›Full record

ArticleFree radical biology & medicine2017

Challenges in the evaluation of thiol-reactive inhibitors of human protein disulfide Isomerase.

Celia K Foster, Colin Thorpe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Free radical biology & medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gaussia princeps luciferase: a bioluminescent substrate for oxidative protein folding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Celia K FosterDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.
Colin ThorpeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States. Electronic address: cthorpe@udel.edu.
University of Delaware · US

Funding

Flavoproteins in Oxidative Protein FoldingR01GM026643 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI THORPE, COLIN · 1985 to 2019
$6.6M
Pilot Research Subproject ProgramP30GM110758 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI PATEL, SANDEEP · 2014 to 2018
$5.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110758NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper addresses how to evaluate the efficacy of the growing inventory of thiol-reactive inhibitors of mammalian protein disulfide Isomerase (PDI) enzymes under realistic concentrations of potentially competing thiol-containing peptides and proteins. For this purpose, we introduce a variant of the widely-used reductase assay by using a commercially-available cysteine derivative (BODIPY FL L-Cystine; BD-SS) that yields a 55-fold increase in fluorescence (excitation/emission; 490/513nm) on scission of the disulfide bond. This plate reader-compatible method detects human PDI down to 5-10nM, can utilize a range of thiol substrates (including 5µM dithiothreitol, 10µM reduced RNase thiols, and 5mM glutathione; GSH), and can operate from pH 6-9.5 in a variety of buffers. PDI assays often employ low micromolar levels of substrates leading to ambiguities when thiol-directed inhibitors are evaluated. The present work utilizes 5mM GSH for both pre-incubation and assay phases to more realistically reflect the high concentration of thiols that an inhibitor would encounter intracellularly. Extracellular PDI faces a much lower concentration of potentially competing thiols; to assess reductase activity under these conditions, the pre-reduced PDI is treated with inhibitor and then fluorescence increase upon reduction of BD-SS is followed in the absence of additional competing thiols. Both assay modes were tested with four mechanistically diverse PDI inhibitors. Two reversible reagents, 3,4-methylenedioxy-β-nitrostyrene (MNS) and the arsenical APAO, were found to be strong inhibitors of PDI in the absence of competing thiols, but were ineffective in the presence of 5mM GSH. A further examination of the nitrostyrene showed that MNS not only forms facile Michael adducts with GSH, but also with the thiols of unfolded proteins (K

Indexed as

AnimalsArsenicalsBinding SitesBoron CompoundsCell-Free SystemCysteineCystineDioxolanesGlucosidesGlutathioneHumansMammalsOxidation-ReductionProtein Disulfide-IsomerasesQuercetinSpectrometry, Fluorescence3,4-methylenedioxy-beta-nitrostyreneacetylaminophenylarsine oxideArsenicalsBODIPY-FL L-cystineBoron CompoundsCysteineCystineDioxolanesGlucosidesGlutathioneProtein Disulfide-IsomerasesQuercetinquercetin-3-O-rutinosideSulfhydryl CompoundsAssayBindingBODIPY FL-L CystineDisulfideDithiothreitolGlutathioneInhibitorProtein disulfide IsomeraseReductaseRibonuclease AThiols

Identifiers

PMID28465261
PMCPMC5507595
OpenAlexW2607704937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.