Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28465185›Full record

ArticleCryobiology2017

3-D printing provides a novel approach for standardization and reproducibility of freezing devices.

E Hu, William Childress, Terrence R Tiersch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cryobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cryopreservation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A generalized approach for sperm cryopreservation in the genusJournal of the World Aquaculture Society · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Human sperm vitrification: the state of the art.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E HuCenter for Aquaculture Technologies, Inc., 8395 Camino Santa Fe, Ste E, San Diego, CA 92121, USA; Aquatic Germplasm and Genetic Resources Center, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA.
William ChildressAquatic Germplasm and Genetic Resources Center, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA.
Terrence R TierschAquatic Germplasm and Genetic Resources Center, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA. Electronic address: ttiersch@agcenter.lsu.edu.

Funding

Enhanced Development of the Xiphophorus Model System R24-OD-011120R24OD011120 · OD · TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WALTER, RONALD B · 2012 to 2019
$5.3M
Development of Germplasm Resources for Preservation of Aquatic ModelsR24OD010441 · OD · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV AGRICULTURAL CENTER · PI BLACKBURN, HARVEY D., MONROE, WILLIAM · 2012 to 2021
$4.3M
Development of Germplasm Resources for Preservation of Aquatic ModelsR24RR023998 · NCRR · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV AGRICULTURAL CENTER · PI TIERSCH, TERRENCE ROBERT · 2008 to 2011
$2.3M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR023998NIH HHS R24 OD010441NIH HHS R24 OD011120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryopreservation has become an important and accepted tool for long-term germplasm conservation of animals and plants. To protect genetic resources, repositories have been developed with national and international cooperation. For a repository to be effective, the genetic material submitted must be of good quality and comparable to other submissions. However, due to a variety of reasons, including constraints in knowledge and available resources, cryopreservation methods for aquatic species vary widely across user groups which reduces reproducibility and weakens quality control. Herein we describe a standardizable freezing device produced using 3-dimensional (3-D) printing and introduce the concept of network sharing to achieve aggregate high-throughput cryopreservation for aquatic species. The objectives were to: 1) adapt widely available polystyrene foam products that would be inexpensive, portable, and provide adequate work space; 2) develop a design suitable for 3-D printing that could provide multiple configurations, be inexpensive, and easy to use, and 3) evaluate various configurations to attain freezing rates suitable for various common cryopreservation containers. Through this approach, identical components can be accessed globally, and we demonstrated that 3-D printers can be used to fabricate parts for standardizable freezing devices yielding relevant and reproducible cooling rates across users. With standardized devices for freezing, methods and samples can harmonize into an aggregated high-throughput pathway not currently available for aquatic species repository development.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalAquatic OrganismsCryopreservationFreezingQuality ControlReproducibility of Results3-D printingAquaticCryopreservationFreezing ratesHigh-throughputStandardized freezing devices

Identifiers

PMID28465185
PMCPMC5592827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.