Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28464926›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Pre/post evaluation of a pilot prevention with positives training program for healthcare providers in North West Province, Republic of South Africa.

Christopher G Kemp, Julia de Kadt, Erushka Pillay, Jennifer M Gilvydis, Evasen Naidoo, Jessica Grignon, Marcia R Weaver

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher G KempDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Ninth and Jefferson Building, 13th Floor, Box 359932, 908 Jefferson Street, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA. kempc@uw.edu.
Julia de KadtI-TECH South Africa, 232 Bronkhorst St, Suite 203 Optiplan House, Nieuw Muckleneuk, Pretoria, South Africa.
Erushka PillayI-TECH South Africa, 232 Bronkhorst St, Suite 203 Optiplan House, Nieuw Muckleneuk, Pretoria, South Africa.
Jennifer M GilvydisDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Ninth and Jefferson Building, 13th Floor, Box 359932, 908 Jefferson Street, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Evasen NaidooI-TECH South Africa, 232 Bronkhorst St, Suite 203 Optiplan House, Nieuw Muckleneuk, Pretoria, South Africa.
Jessica GrignonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Ninth and Jefferson Building, 13th Floor, Box 359932, 908 Jefferson Street, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Marcia R WeaverDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Ninth and Jefferson Building, 13th Floor, Box 359932, 908 Jefferson Street, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevention interventions for people living with HIV/AIDS are an important component of HIV programs. We report the results of a pilot evaluation of a four-hour, clinic-based training for healthcare providers in South Africa on HIV prevention assessments and messages. This pre/post pilot evaluation examined whether the training was associated with providers delivering more prevention messages.

methodsSeventy providers were trained at four public primary care clinics with a high volume of HIV patients. Pre- and post-training patient exit surveys were conducted using Audio-Computer Assisted Structured Interviews. Seven provider appropriate messaging outcomes and one summary provider outcome were compared pre- and post-training using Poisson regression.

resultsFour hundred fifty-nine patients pre-training and 405 post-training with known HIV status were interviewed, including 175 and 176 HIV positive patients respectively. Among HIV positive patients, delivery of all appropriate messages by providers declined post-training. The summary outcome decreased from 56 to 50%; adjusted rate ratio 0.92 (95% CI = 0.87-0.97). Sensitivity analyses adjusting for training coverage and time since training detected fewer declines. Among HIV negative patients the summary score was stable at 32% pre- and post-training; adjusted rate ratio 1.05 (95% CI = 0.98-1.12).

conclusionsSurprisingly, this training was associated with a decrease in prevention messages delivered to HIV positive patients by providers. Limited training coverage and delays between training and post-training survey may partially account for this apparent decrease. A more targeted approach to prevention messages may be more effective.

Indexed as

HIV SeropositivityInservice TrainingPatient Education as TopicAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesEducation, Nursing, ContinuingFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPoisson DistributionProgram EvaluationSouth AfricaAudio-computer assisted structured interviewsDignity and preventionEvaluationHIV/AIDSPositive healthPrevention with positivesSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID28464926
PMCPMC5414361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.