Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28464919›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2017

The role of apoptosis repressor with a CARD domain (ARC) in the therapeutic resistance of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): the crucial role of ARC in the inhibition of extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic signalling.

Csaba Toth, Sarah Funke, Vanessa Nitsche, Anna Liverts, Viktoriya Zlachevska, Marcia Gasis, Constanze Wiek, Helmut Hanenberg, Csaba Mahotka, Peter Schirmacher and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. No Time to Die: How Kidney Cancer Evades Cell Death.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Csaba TothInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. csaba.toth@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Sarah FunkeInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Vanessa NitscheInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Anna LivertsInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Viktoriya ZlachevskaInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marcia GasisDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Constanze WiekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Heinrich Heine University, Universitätsstrasse 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Helmut HanenbergDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Heinrich Heine University, Universitätsstrasse 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Csaba MahotkaInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Peter SchirmacherInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian HeikausInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHerman Miller (United States) · USUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal cell carcinomas (RCCs) display broad resistance against conventional radio- and chemotherapies, which is due at least in part to impairments in both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways. One important anti-apoptotic factor that is strongly overexpressed in RCCs and known to inhibit both apoptotic pathways is ARC (apoptosis repressor with a CARD domain).

methodsExpression and subcellular distribution of ARC in RCC tissue samples and RCC cell lines were determined by immunohistochemistry and fluorescent immunohistochemistry, respectively. Extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis signalling were induced by TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand), ABT-263 or topotecan. ARC knock-down was performed in clearCa-12 cells using lentiviral transduction of pGIPZ. shRNAmir constructs. Extrinsic respectively intrinsic apoptosis were induced by TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand), ABT263 or topotecan. Potential synergistic effects were tested by pre-treatment with topotecan and subsequent treatment with ABT263. Activation of different caspases and mitochondrial depolarisation (JC-1 staining) were analysed by flow cytometry. Protein expression of Bcl-2 family members and ARC in RCC cell lines was measured by Western blotting. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test.

resultsRegarding the extrinsic pathway, ARC knockdown strongly enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis by increasing the activation level of caspase-8. Regarding the intrinsic pathway, ARC, which was only weakly expressed in the nuclei of RCCs in vivo, exerted its anti-apoptotic effect by impairing mitochondrial activation rather than inhibiting p53. Topotecan- and ABT-263-induced apoptosis was strongly enhanced following ARC knockdown in RCC cell lines. In addition, topotecan pre-treatment enhanced ABT-263-induced apoptosis and this effect was amplified in ARC-knockdown cells.

conclusionTaken together, our results are the first to demonstrate the importance of ARC protein in the inhibition of both the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways of apoptosis in RCCs. In this context, ARC cooperates with anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members to exert its strong anti-apoptotic effects and is therefore an important factor not only in the therapeutic resistance but also in future therapy strategies (i.e., Bcl-2 inhibitors) in RCC. In sum, targeting of ARC may enhance the therapeutic response in combination therapy protocols.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmActive Transport, Cell NucleusAniline CompoundsApoptosisApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCarcinoma, Renal CellCell Line, TumorCell NucleusCytoplasmGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansKidney NeoplasmsMitochondriaMolecular Targeted TherapyMuscle ProteinsAniline CompoundsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsMuscle ProteinsnavitoclaxNOL3 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2SulfonamidesTopotecanTumor Suppressor Protein p53ABT-263ApoptosisARCBcl-2 familyrenal cell carcinoma (RCC)TRAIL

Identifiers

PMID28464919
PMCPMC5414156
OpenAlexW2611334886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.