Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28464877›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2017

Assessment of knowledge about biobanking among healthcare students and their willingness to donate biospecimens.

Leena Merdad, Lama Aldakhil, Rawan Gadi, Mourad Assidi, Salina Y Saddick, Adel Abuzenadah, Jim Vaught, Abdelbaset Buhmeida, Mohammed H Al-Qahtani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Public Attitude towards Biobanking: An Italian University Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Associations between the Willingness to Donate Samples to Biobanks and Selected Psychological Variables.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leena MerdadDepartment of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80209, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Lama AldakhilCollege of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 22490, Riyadh, 11426, Saudi Arabia.
Rawan GadiDepartment of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80209, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Mourad AssidiCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80216, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Salina Y SaddickDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Adel AbuzenadahCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80216, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Jim VaughtInternational Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1B3, Canada.
Abdelbaset BuhmeidaCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80216, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia. abuhme@utu.fi.
Mohammed H Al-QahtaniCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80216, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiobanks and biospecimen collections are becoming a primary means of delivering personalized diagnostics and tailoring individualized therapeutics. This shift towards precision medicine (PM) requires interactions among a variety of stakeholders, including the public, patients, healthcare providers, government, and donors. Very few studies have investigated the role of healthcare students in biobanking and biospecimen donations. The main aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the knowledge of senior healthcare students about biobanks and (2) to assess the students' willingness to donate biospecimens and the factors influencing their attitudes.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among senior healthcare students at King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Saudi Arabia. The data were obtained using a self-administered questionnaire in English. In addition to the respondents' biographical data section, the questionnaire assessed the respondents' general knowledge about biobanking, the factors influencing their willingness to donate biospecimens to biobanks and their general attitudes towards biomedical research.

resultsA total of 597 senior healthcare students were included in the study. The general knowledge score was 3.2 (±1.6) out of 7. Only approximately 44% and 27% of students were aware of the terms "Human Genome Project" (HGP) and "biobank," respectively. The majority of the students (89%) were willing to donate biospecimens to biobanks. Multiple factors were significantly associated with their willingness to donate, including their perceived general health (p < 0.001), past experience with both tissue testing (p < 0.04) and tissue donation (p < 0.001), biobanking knowledge score (p < 0.001) and biomedical research attitude score (p < 0.001). The main reasons for students' willingness to donate were advancement of medical research and societal benefits, whereas misuse of biospecimens and confidentiality breaches were the main reasons for a reluctance to donate.

conclusionDespite their strong willingness to donate biospecimens, students exhibited a notable lack of knowledge about biobanking and the HGP. To expedite the transition towards PM, it is highly recommended to enhance healthcare curricula by including more educational and awareness programmes to familiarize students with OMICs technologies in addition to the scope of research and clinical applications.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTissue and Organ ProcurementCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSaudi ArabiaStudents, Health OccupationsSurveys and QuestionnairesBiobankBiospecimensKnowledgeMedical studentsPrecision medicineSurveyWillingness to donate

Identifiers

PMID28464877
PMCPMC5414189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.