Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28464870›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Comparative analysis of the predicted secretomes of Rosaceae scab pathogens Venturia inaequalis and V. pirina reveals expanded effector families and putative determinants of host range.

Cecilia H Deng, Kim M Plummer, Darcy A B Jones, Carl H Mesarich, Jason Shiller, Adam P Taranto, Andrew J Robinson, Patrick Kastner, Nathan E Hall, Matthew D Templeton and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Hemibiotrophic Apple Scab FungusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Secretomic Insights into the Pathophysiology ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cecilia H DengThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited (PFR), Auckland, New Zealand.
Kim M PlummerAnimal, Plant & Soil Sciences Department, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. K.Plummer@latrobe.edu.au.
Darcy A B JonesAnimal, Plant & Soil Sciences Department, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Carl H MesarichThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited (PFR), Auckland, New Zealand.
Jason ShillerAnimal, Plant & Soil Sciences Department, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Adam P TarantoAnimal, Plant & Soil Sciences Department, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew J RobinsonAnimal, Plant & Soil Sciences Department, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Patrick KastnerAnimal, Plant & Soil Sciences Department, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nathan E HallAnimal, Plant & Soil Sciences Department, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Matthew D TempletonThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited (PFR), Auckland, New Zealand.
Joanna K BowenThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited (PFR), Auckland, New Zealand. Joanna.Bowen@plantandfood.co.nz.
AgriBio · AULa Trobe University · AUPlant & Food Research · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFungal plant pathogens belonging to the genus Venturia cause damaging scab diseases of members of the Rosaceae. In terms of economic impact, the most important of these are V. inaequalis, which infects apple, and V. pirina, which is a pathogen of European pear. Given that Venturia fungi colonise the sub-cuticular space without penetrating plant cells, it is assumed that effectors that contribute to virulence and determination of host range will be secreted into this plant-pathogen interface. Thus the predicted secretomes of a range of isolates of Venturia with distinct host-ranges were interrogated to reveal putative proteins involved in virulence and pathogenicity.

resultsGenomes of Venturia pirina (one European pear scab isolate) and Venturia inaequalis (three apple scab, and one loquat scab, isolates) were sequenced and the predicted secretomes of each isolate identified. RNA-Seq was conducted on the apple-specific V. inaequalis isolate Vi1 (in vitro and infected apple leaves) to highlight virulence and pathogenicity components of the secretome. Genes encoding over 600 small secreted proteins (candidate effectors) were identified, most of which are novel to Venturia, with expansion of putative effector families a feature of the genus. Numerous genes with similarity to Leptosphaeria maculans AvrLm6 and the Verticillium spp. Ave1 were identified. Candidates for avirulence effectors with cognate resistance genes involved in race-cultivar specificity were identified, as were putative proteins involved in host-species determination. Candidate effectors were found, on average, to be in regions of relatively low gene-density and in closer proximity to repeats (e.g. transposable elements), compared with core eukaryotic genes.

conclusionsComparative secretomics has revealed candidate effectors from Venturia fungal plant pathogens that attack pome fruit. Effectors that are putative determinants of host range were identified; both those that may be involved in race-cultivar and host-species specificity. Since many of the effector candidates are in close proximity to repetitive sequences this may point to a possible mechanism for the effector gene family expansion observed and a route to diversification via transposition and repeat-induced point mutation.

Indexed as

GenomicsHost SpecificityAscomycotaCell WallPlant DiseasesRosaceaeVirulenceAppleEffectorEuropean pearMalus x domesticaPyrus communisSecretomeVenturia inaequalisVenturia pirina

Identifiers

PMID28464870
PMCPMC5412055
OpenAlexW2611625397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.