ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
Intervention in prediction measure: a new approach to assessing variable importance for random forests.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning in biological research: key algorithms, applications, and future directions.BMC biology · 2025Review
- LINE-1 DNA methylation mediates smoking-related risk in site-specific urothelial carcinoma: a Taiwan case-control study.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
- Mapping the covariate-adjusted spatial effects of childhood anemia in Ethiopia using a semi-parametric additive model.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Impacts of socioeconomic and environmental factors on neoplasms incidence rates using machine learning and GIS: a cross-sectional study in Iran.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Out of (the) bag-encoding categorical predictors impacts out-of-bag samples.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Exploring the variable importance in random forests under correlations: a general concept applied to donor organ quality in post-transplant survival.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- A neural network model to screen feature genes for pancreatic cancer.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Identification of Feature Genes of a Novel Neural Network Model for Bladder Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Identifying Chinese social media users' need for affect from their online behaviors.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Ranking the Predictive Power of Clinical and Biological Features Associated With Disease Progression in Huntington's Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Investigating Predictors of Preserved Cognitive Function in Older Women Using Machine Learning: Women's Health Initiative Memory Study.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Article
- Conditional permutation importance revisited.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Exploring Relationships Among Peripheral Amyloid Beta, Tau, Cytokines, Cognitive Function, and Psychosomatic Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors.Biological research for nursing · 2020Article
- Importance of details in food descriptions in estimating population nutrient intake distributions.Nutrition journal · 2019Article
- A new approach for interpreting Random Forest models and its application to the biology of ageing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Improved high-dimensional prediction with Random Forests by the use of co-data.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRandom forests are a popular method in many fields since they can be successfully applied to complex data, with a small sample size, complex interactions and correlations, mixed type predictors, etc. Furthermore, they provide variable importance measures that aid qualitative interpretation and also the selection of relevant predictors. However, most of these measures rely on the choice of a performance measure. But measures of prediction performance are not unique or there is not even a clear definition, as in the case of multivariate response random forests.
methodsA new alternative importance measure, called Intervention in Prediction Measure, is investigated. It depends on the structure of the trees, without depending on performance measures. It is compared with other well-known variable importance measures in different contexts, such as a classification problem with variables of different types, another classification problem with correlated predictor variables, and problems with multivariate responses and predictors of different types.
resultsSeveral simulation studies are carried out, showing the new measure to be very competitive. In addition, it is applied in two well-known bioinformatics applications previously used in other papers. Improvements in performance are also provided for these applications by the use of this new measure.
conclusionsThis new measure is expressed as a percentage, which makes it attractive in terms of interpretability. It can be used with new observations. It can be defined globally, for each class (in a classification problem) and case-wise. It can easily be computed for any kind of response, including multivariate responses. Furthermore, it can be used with any algorithm employed to grow each individual tree. It can be used in place of (or in addition to) other variable importance measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.