ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2017
Progress toward openness, transparency, and reproducibility in cognitive neuroscience.
Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of statistical learning in autism spectrum disorder.Molecular autism · 2025Pooled it
- Hemispheric Asymmetry in TMS-Induced Effects on Spatial Attention: A Meta-Analysis.Neuropsychology review · 2024Pooled it
- A research agenda for understanding how social inequality is linked to brain structure and function.Nature human behaviour · 2024Pooled it
- SNIRF2BIDS: a GUI-based tool for converting functional near-infrared spectroscopy data to the Brain Imaging Data Structure in R.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- The Brain, Body, and Behavior Dataset (BBBD): Multimodal Recordings during Educational Videos.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Prediction, syntax and semantic grounding in the brain and large language models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Spatial Frequency Maps in Human Visual Cortex: A Replication and Extension.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- How will developmental neuroimaging contribute to the prediction of neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders? Challenges and opportunities.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Overlooked poor-quality patient samples in sequencing data impair reproducibility of published clinically relevant datasets.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Transparency and reproducibility in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Transparency and Reproducibility in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Increasing Value and Reducing Waste of Research on Neurofeedback Effects in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A State-of-the-Art-Review.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2024Review
- Topological cluster statistic (TCS): Toward structural connectivity-guided fMRI cluster enhancement.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- A shared neural basis underlying psychiatric comorbidity.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- Shedding light on functional near-infrared spectroscopy and open science practices.Neurophotonics · 2023Article
- Reproducibility and Scientific Integrity of Big Data Research in Urban Public Health and Digital Epidemiology: A Call to Action.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Editorial: What the New White House Rules on Equitable Access Mean for the Neurosciences.Neuroinformatics · 2023Article
- Blueprints for measuring natural behavior.iScience · 2022Review
- Open multimodal iEEG-fMRI dataset from naturalistic stimulation with a short audiovisual film.Scientific data · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that many findings in psychological science and cognitive neuroscience may prove difficult to reproduce; statistical power in brain imaging studies is low and has not improved recently; software errors in analysis tools are common and can go undetected for many years; and, a few large-scale studies notwithstanding, open sharing of data, code, and materials remain the rare exception. At the same time, there is a renewed focus on reproducibility, transparency, and openness as essential core values in cognitive neuroscience. The emergence and rapid growth of data archives, meta-analytic tools, software pipelines, and research groups devoted to improved methodology reflect this new sensibility. We review evidence that the field has begun to embrace new open research practices and illustrate how these can begin to address problems of reproducibility, statistical power, and transparency in ways that will ultimately accelerate discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.