Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28464475›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2017

Isolation of CD248-expressing stromal vascular fraction for targeted improvement of wound healing.

Elizabeth Brett, Elizabeth R Zielins, Monica Chin, Michael Januszyk, Charles P Blackshear, Michael Findlay, Arash Momeni, Geoffrey C Gurtner, Michael T Longaker, Derrick C Wan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biomimetic Hydrogels to Promote Wound Healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth BrettHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Elizabeth R ZielinsHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Monica ChinHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Michael JanuszykHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Charles P BlackshearHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Michael FindlayHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Arash MomeniHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Geoffrey C GurtnerHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Michael T LongakerHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Derrick C WanHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Stanford University · USIn-Q-Tel · USInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine · IN

Funding

Induced pluripotent stem cells in the understanding and treatment of heart diseaseU01HL099776 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2009 to 2015
$8.2M
Osteogenic Enrichment of Adipose Derived Stromal CellsR01DE021683 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GURTNER, GEOFFREY C, LONGAKER, MICHAEL T · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Defining BMP-responsive lncRNA for bone regenerationK08DE024269 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WAN, DERRICK · 2014 to 2018
$632k
Enhancing Bcl-2 Expression for Bone Regeneration.R21DE024230 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T · 2014 to 2015
$443k
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099776NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE024269NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021683NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE024230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing remains a global issue of disability, cost, and health. Addition of cells from the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue has been shown to increase the rate of full thickness wound closure. This study aimed to investigate the angiogenic mechanisms of CD248+ SVF cells in the context of full thickness excisional wounds. Single cell transcriptional analysis was used to identify and cluster angiogenic gene-expressing cells, which was then correlated with surface marker expression. SVF cells isolated from human lipoaspirate were FACS sorted based on the presence of CD248. Cells were analyzed for angiogenic gene expression and ability to promote microvascular tubule formation in vitro. Following this, 6mm full thickness dermal wounds were created on the dorsa of immunocompromised mice and then treated with CD248+, CD248-, or unsorted SVF cells delivered in a pullalan-collagen hydrogel or the hydrogel alone. Wounds were measured every other day photometrically until closure. Wounds were also evaluated histologically at 7 and 14 days post-wounding and when fully healed to assess for reepithelialization and development of neovasculature. Wounds treated with CD248+ cells healed significantly faster than other treatment groups, and at 7 days, had quantitatively more reepithelialization. Concurrently, immunohistochemistry of CD31 revealed a much higher presence of vascularity in the CD248+ SVF cells treated group at the time of healing and at 14 days post-op, consistent with a pro-angiogenic effect of CD248+ cells in vivo. Therefore, using CD248+ pro-angiogenic cells obtained from SVF presents a viable strategy in wound healing by promoting increased vessel growth in the wound.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAnimalsCells, CulturedDisease Models, AnimalGelsGene Expression RegulationImmunohistochemistryMaleMiceStem Cell TransplantationStromal CellsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AWound HealingWounds and InjuriesAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsGelsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Avascular endothelial growth factor A, mouse

Identifiers

PMID28464475
PMCPMC5568953
OpenAlexW2611730169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.