ArticleGenetic epidemiology2017
Inferring gene regulatory relationships with a high-dimensional robust approach.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gene-environment interaction identification via penalized robust divergence.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2022Article
- Clustering multilayer omics data using MuNCut.BMC genomics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Gene expression (GE) levels have important biological and clinical implications. They are regulated by copy number alterations (CNAs). Modeling the regulatory relationships between GEs and CNAs facilitates understanding disease biology and can also have values in translational medicine. The expression level of a gene can be regulated by its cis-acting as well as trans-acting CNAs, and the set of trans-acting CNAs is usually not known, which poses a high-dimensional selection and estimation problem. Most of the existing studies share a common limitation in that they cannot accommodate long-tailed distributions or contamination of GE data. In this study, we develop a high-dimensional robust regression approach to infer the regulatory relationships between GEs and CNAs. A high-dimensional regression model is used to accommodate the effects of both cis-acting and trans-acting CNAs. A density power divergence loss function is used to accommodate long-tailed GE distributions and contamination. Penalization is adopted for regularized estimation and selection of relevant CNAs. The proposed approach is effectively realized using a coordinate descent algorithm. Simulation shows that it has competitive performance compared to the nonrobust benchmark and the robust LAD (least absolute deviation) approach. We analyze TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) data on cutaneous melanoma and study GE-CNA regulations in the RAP (regulation of apoptosis) pathway, which further demonstrates the satisfactory performance of the proposed approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.