Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28464210›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2017

Development of an optical system for the non-invasive tracking of stem cell growth on microcarriers.

Akinlolu Oyekunle Oluseun Odeleye, Sara Castillo-Avila, Mathew Boon, Haydn Martin, Karen Coopman

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Stem Cell Tracing Through MR Molecular Imaging.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akinlolu Oyekunle Oluseun OdeleyeCentre for Biological Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0146-1111
Sara Castillo-AvilaUniversity of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Mathew BoonUniversity of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Haydn MartinUniversity of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Karen CoopmanCentre for Biological Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of medicinal indications for stem cell therapies has seen a need to develop the manufacturing capacity for adherent cells such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). One such development is in the use of microcarriers, which facilitate enhanced cell densities for adherent stem cell cultures when compared with 2D culture platforms. Given the variety of stem cell expansion systems commercially available, novel methods of non-invasive and automated monitoring of cell number, confluence, and aggregation, within disparate environments, will become imperative to process control, ensuring reliable and consistent performance. The in situ epi-illumination of mouse embryonic fibroblasts and human mesenchymal stem cells attached to Cytodex 1 and 3 microcarriers was achieved using a bespoke microscope. Robust image processing techniques were developed to provide quantitative measurements of confluence, aggregate recognition, and cell number, without the need for fluorescent labeling or cell detachment. Large datasets of cells counted on individual microcarriers were statistically analyzed and compared with NucleoCounter measurements, with an average difference of less than 7% observed from days 0 to 6 of a 12-day culture noted, prior to the onset of aggregation. The developed image acquisition system and post-processing methodologies were successfully applied to dynamically moving colonized microcarriers. The proposed system offers a novel method of cell identification at the individual level, to consistently and accurately assess viable cell number, confluence, and cell distribution, while also minimizing the variability inherent in the current invasive means by which cells adhered to microcarriers are analyzed. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 2032-2042. © 2017 The Authors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Optical DevicesCell EnlargementCells, CulturedCell TrackingHumansImage EnhancementMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMicroscopyMiniaturizationPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificitycell culturecell therapyepi-illuminationimage analysismesenchymal stem cellsmicrocarriers

Identifiers

PMID28464210
PMCPMC5575559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.