Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28464013›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Simulating the spread of selection-driven genotypes using landscape resistance models for desert bighorn sheep.

Tyler G Creech, Clinton W Epps, Erin L Landguth, John D Wehausen, Rachel S Crowhurst, Brandon Holton, Ryan J Monello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Circuit-theory applications to connectivity science and conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tyler G CreechDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8049-6680
Clinton W EppsDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Erin L LandguthComputational Ecology Laboratory, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America.
John D WehausenWhite Mountain Research Center, University of California, Bishop, California, United States of America.
Rachel S CrowhurstDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Brandon HoltonGrand Canyon National Park, National Park Service, Grand Canyon, Arizona, United States of America.
Ryan J MonelloBiological Resources Division, National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Landscape genetic studies based on neutral genetic markers have contributed to our understanding of the influence of landscape composition and configuration on gene flow and genetic variation. However, the potential for species to adapt to changing landscapes will depend on how natural selection influences adaptive genetic variation. We demonstrate how landscape resistance models can be combined with genetic simulations incorporating natural selection to explore how the spread of adaptive variation is affected by landscape characteristics, using desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) in three differing regions of the southwestern United States as an example. We conducted genetic sampling and least-cost path modeling to optimize landscape resistance models independently for each region, and then simulated the spread of an adaptive allele favored by selection across each region. Optimized landscape resistance models differed between regions with respect to landscape variables included and their relationships to resistance, but the slope of terrain and the presence of water barriers and major roads had the greatest impacts on gene flow. Genetic simulations showed that differences among landscapes strongly influenced spread of adaptive genetic variation, with faster spread (1) in landscapes with more continuously distributed habitat and (2) when a pre-existing allele (i.e., standing genetic variation) rather than a novel allele (i.e., mutation) served as the source of adaptive genetic variation. The combination of landscape resistance models and genetic simulations has broad conservation applications and can facilitate comparisons of adaptive potential within and between landscapes.

Indexed as

EcosystemGene FlowModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationDesert ClimateGenotypeGeographyMicrosatellite RepeatsMultivariate AnalysisSheep, BighornSouthwestern United States

Identifiers

PMID28464013
PMCPMC5413035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.