Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28463582›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2017

Medical students' attitude toward influenza vaccination: Results of a survey in the University of Bari (Italy).

Maria Serena Gallone, Maria Filomena Gallone, Maria Giovanna Cappelli, Francesca Fortunato, Domenico Martinelli, Michele Quarto, Rosa Prato, Silvio Tafuri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. SIMED-New Doc course, a matter of reflection.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Serena Gallonea Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology , University of Bari Aldo Moro , Bari , Italy.
Maria Filomena Gallonea Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology , University of Bari Aldo Moro , Bari , Italy.
Maria Giovanna Cappellib Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences , University of Foggia , Foggia , Italy.
Francesca Fortunatob Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences , University of Foggia , Foggia , Italy.
Domenico Martinellib Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences , University of Foggia , Foggia , Italy.
Michele Quartoa Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology , University of Bari Aldo Moro , Bari , Italy.
Rosa Pratob Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences , University of Foggia , Foggia , Italy.
Silvio Tafuria Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology , University of Bari Aldo Moro , Bari , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza vaccination is strongly recommended for Italian healthcare professionals, but vaccine coverage is low. Since 2012, vaccination is also offered to medical students as part of the National Immunization Plan; however, few Medical Schools has implemented the plan so far. To study determinants of vaccination compliance, we conducted a survey among medical students at the University of Bari, where influenza vaccination has been actively offered since 2013. Information was obtained by means of an online anonymous questionnaire administered in April 2014. We enrolled 669 students, 383 (57%) vaccinated; 54% were female and the average age was 23.9 ± 4.9 y. Determinants of getting vaccinated were analyzed in a multivariate logistic model. Receiving invitation from the University (aOR = 3.8; 95%CI = 1.2-12.3; p = 0.026), the opinion that vaccine is safe (aOR = 2.8; 95%CI = 1.5-5.0; p = 0.001) and useful (aOR = 3.4; 95%CI = 1.7-6.7; p<0.0001), a specific training about influenza vaccination during the course (aOR = 1.5; 95%CI = 1.1-2.1; p = 0.043), and considering himself as at a major risk of influenza complication (aOR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.1-2.9; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with vaccine acceptance. Active invitation and training are confirmed as key actions (as in children vaccination strategies) and, according to our results, they could be routinely used to promote vaccination in hard-to-reach groups such as healthcare workers.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfluenza VaccinesCase-Control StudiesEducation, MedicalFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInfluenza, HumanItalyLogistic ModelsMaleStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesVaccinationInfluenza Vaccinesattitudescase-control studyeducational traininghard-to-reach groupshealth care workersmedical students

Identifiers

PMID28463582
PMCPMC5557231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.