Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28463580›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2017

Deying Zhang, Yong Zhang, Yuanyuan Zhang, Hualin Yi, Zhan Wang, Rongpei Wu, Dawei He, Guanghui Wei, Shicheng Wei, Yun Hu and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Dermal Extracellular Matrix-Derived Hydrogels as anTissue engineering. Part A · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Deying Zhang1 Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University , Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China .
Yong Zhang2 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Yuanyuan Zhang2 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Hualin Yi2 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Zhan Wang2 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Rongpei Wu2 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Dawei He1 Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University , Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China .
Guanghui Wei1 Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University , Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China .
Shicheng Wei4 Laboratory of Biomaterials and Regenerative Medicine, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University , Beijing, China .
Yun Hu2 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Junhong Deng2 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Tracy Criswell2 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
James Yoo2 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Yu Zhou2 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Anthony Atala2 Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Forest Institute · USPeking University · CN

Funding

Stem Cell Therapy Combined with Growth Factors for Stress Urinary IncontinenceR56DK100669 · NIDDK · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ZHANG, YUANYUAN NO · 2014 to 2014
$116k
NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK100669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal muscle precursor cells (MPCs) are considered a key candidate for cell therapy in the treatment of skeletal muscle dysfunction due to injury, disease, or age. However, expansion of a sufficient number of functional skeletal muscle cells in vitro from a small tissue biopsy has been challenging due to changes in phenotypic expression of these cells under traditional culture conditions. Thus, the aim of the study was to develop a better culture system for the expansion and myo-differentiation of MPCs that could further be used for therapy. For this purpose, we developed an ideal method of tissue decellularization and compared the ability of different matrices to support MPC growth and differentiation. Porcine-derived skeletal muscle and liver and kidney extracellular matrix (ECM) were generated by decellularization methods consisting of distilled water, 0.2 mg/mL DNase, or 5% fetal bovine serum. Acellular matrices were further homogenized, dissolved, and combined with a hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel decorated with heparin (ECM-HA-HP). The cell proliferation and myogenic differentiation capacity of human MPCs were assessed when grown on gel alone, ECM, or each ECM-HA-HP substrate. Human MPC proliferation was significantly enhanced when cultured on the ECM-HA-HP substrates compared to the other substrates tested, with the greatest proliferation on the muscle ECM-HA-HP (mECM-HA-HP) substrate. The number of differentiated myotubes was significantly increased on the mECM-HA-HP substrate compared to the other gel-ECM substrates, as well as the numbers of MPCs expressing specific myogenic cell markers (i.e., myosin, desmin, myoD, and myf5). In conclusion, skeletal mECM-HA-HP as a culture substrate provided an optimal culture microenvironment potentially due to its similarity to the in vivo environment. These data suggest a potential use of skeletal muscle-derived ECM gel for the expansion and differentiation of human MPCs for cell-based therapy for skeletal muscle dysfunction.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell DifferentiationAnimalsCell CountCell ProliferationCells, CulturedDNAExtracellular MatrixHeparinHumansHyaluronic AcidMuscle DevelopmentMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMyoblastsOrgan SpecificitySus scrofaDNAHeparinHyaluronic Aciddifferentiationextracellular matrixskeletal muscle precursor cellsurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID28463580
PMCPMC5568009
OpenAlexW2748969123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.