Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28463551›Full record

ArticleNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2017

Comparative interactomics provides evidence for functional specialization of the nuclear pore complex.

Samson O Obado, Mark C Field, Michael P Rout

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Identification of divergentbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Lessons from the deep: mechanisms behind diversification of eukaryotic protein complexes.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023
    Article
  6. TheRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Breaking the Y.PLoS genetics · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samson O Obadoa The Rockefeller University , New York , NY , USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3161-0218
Mark C Fieldb Wellcome Trust Centre for Anti-Infectives Research, School of Life Sciences , University of Dundee , Dundee , UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4866-2885
Michael P Routa The Rockefeller University , New York , NY , USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2010-706X
Rockefeller University · USUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

TR&D Project 4. The Imaging Stage: Multiscale Spatiotemporal Modeling of Macromolecular Systems in Cellular NeighborhoodsP41GM109824 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI ROUT, MICHAEL P · 2014 to 2023
$18.8M
Structure-Function Mapping of the Nuclear Pore Complex-RenewalR01GM112108 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN D. AITCHISON, MICHAEL P ROUT · 2015 to 2026
$9.1M
Medical Research Council MR/N010558/1NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM109824NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112108Wellcome Trust 203134/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The core architecture of the eukaryotic cell was established well over one billion years ago, and is largely retained in all extant lineages. However, eukaryotic cells also possess lineage-specific features, frequently keyed to specific functional requirements. One quintessential core eukaryotic structure is the nuclear pore complex (NPC), responsible for regulating exchange of macromolecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm as well as acting as a nuclear organizational hub. NPC architecture has been best documented in one eukaryotic supergroup, the Opisthokonts (e.g. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Homo sapiens), which although compositionally similar, have significant variations in certain NPC subcomplex structures. The variation of NPC structure across other taxa in the eukaryotic kingdom however, remains poorly understood. We explored trypanosomes, highly divergent organisms, and mapped and assigned their NPC proteins to specific substructures to reveal their NPC architecture. We showed that the NPC central structural scaffold is conserved, likely across all eukaryotes, but more peripheral elements can exhibit very significant lineage-specific losses, duplications or other alterations in their components. Amazingly, trypanosomes lack the major components of the mRNA export platform that are asymmetrically localized within yeast and vertebrate NPCs. Concomitant with this, the trypanosome NPC is ALMOST completely symmetric with the nuclear basket being the only major source of asymmetry. We suggest these features point toward a stepwise evolution of the NPC in which a coating scaffold first stabilized the pore after which selective gating emerged and expanded, leading to the addition of peripheral remodeling machineries on the nucleoplasmic and cytoplasmic sides of the pore.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAnimalsEvolution, MolecularHumansModels, BiologicalNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsOpisthorchisProtein FoldingTrypanosomaNuclear Pore Complex Proteinseukaryogenesismolecular evolutionmRNA exportnuclear pore complexTrypanosoma brucei

Identifiers

PMID28463551
PMCPMC5597298
OpenAlexW2611285583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.