Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28462504›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2018

The human newborn's umwelt: Unexplored pathways and perspectives.

Vanessa André, Séverine Henry, Alban Lemasson, Martine Hausberger, Virginie Durier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vanessa AndréUniversité de Rennes 1, Ethologie Animale et Humaine, EthoS, UMR 6552, CNRS, Université Caen Normandie, Rennes, France. vanessa.andre@univ-rennes1.fr.
Séverine HenryUniversité de Rennes 1, Ethologie Animale et Humaine, EthoS, UMR 6552, CNRS, Université Caen Normandie, Rennes, France.
Alban LemassonUniversité de Rennes 1, Ethologie Animale et Humaine, EthoS, UMR 6552, CNRS, Université Caen Normandie, Rennes, France.
Martine HausbergerCNRS, Ethologie Animale et Humaine, EthoS, UMR 6552, Université de Rennes 1, Université de Caen Normandie, Rennes, France.
Virginie DurierCNRS, Ethologie Animale et Humaine, EthoS, UMR 6552, Université de Rennes 1, Université de Caen Normandie, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, newborns, and especially premature newborns, were thought to "feel nothing." However, over the past decades, a growing body of evidence has shown that newborns are aware of their environment, but the extent and the onset of some sensory capacities remain largely unknown. The goal of this review is to update our current knowledge concerning newborns' perceptual world and how ready they are to cope with an entirely different sensory environment following birth. We aim to establish not only how and when each sensory ability arises during the pre-/postbirth period but also discuss how senses are studied. We conclude that although many studies converge to show that newborns are clearly sentient beings, much is still unknown. Further, we identify a series of internal and external factors that could explain discrepancies between studies, and we propose perspectives for future studies. Finally, through examples from animal studies, we illustrate the importance of this detailed knowledge to pursue the enhancement of newborns' daily living conditions. Indeed, this is a prerequisite for assessing the effects of the physical environment and routine procedures on newborns' welfare.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentHumansInfant, NewbornPerceptionSensationFetusNewbornReactionSensory perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.