ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2017
The Impact of Medication-Based Risk Adjustment on the Association Between Veteran Health Outcomes and Dual Health System Use.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A head-to-head comparison of the validity and predictive ability for health outcomes of diagnosis versus medication-based comorbidity indices.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Medicaid Expansion and Veterans' Reliance on the VA for Depression Care.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2022Article
- Latent Class Analysis of Prescribing Behavior of Primary Care Physicians in the Veterans Health Administration.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Low-Value Diagnostic Testing for 4 Common Conditions in the Veterans Health Administration.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Use of a medication-based risk adjustment index to predict mortality among veterans dually-enrolled in VA and medicare.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019Article
- Dual Receipt of Prescription Opioids From the Department of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Part D and Prescription Opioid Overdose Death Among Veterans: A Nested Case-Control Study.Annals of internal medicine · 2019Article
- A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Providers' Experiences with the Veterans Choice Program.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
- Receipt of Overlapping Opioid and Benzodiazepine Prescriptions Among Veterans Dually Enrolled in Medicare Part D and the Department of Veterans Affairs: A Cross-sectional Study.Annals of internal medicine · 2018Article
- Measuring Multimorbidity: A Risky Business.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVeterans commonly receive care from both Veterans Health Administration (VA) and non-VA sources (i.e., dual use). A major challenge in comparing health outcomes between dual users and VA-predominant users is applying an accurate method of risk adjustment.
objectiveTo determine how different comorbidity indices affect the association between patterns of dual use and health outcomes.
designRetrospective cohort.
participantsA total of 316,775 community-dwelling Veterans (≥65 years) with type 2 diabetes who were enrolled in VA and fee-for-service Medicare from 2008 to 2010.
methodsWe determined the associations between dual use and death or diabetes-related hospitalization in FY 2010 using multivariable models incorporating claims-based (Elixhauser) or medication-based (RxRisk-V) risk adjustment. Dual use was classified using four previously identified groups of health services users: 1) VA-predominant, 2) VA + Medicare visits and labs, 3) VA + Medicare test strips, and 4) VA + Medicare medications. KEY
resultsControlling for Elixhauser comorbidities, dual-use groups 2-4 had significantly decreased odds of death or hospitalization compared to VA-predominant users. Controlling for RxRisk-V comorbidities, groups 2-4 had increased odds of death compared to VA-predominant users, but variable odds of hospitalization, with group 2 having increased odds (OR 1.06, CI 1.04-1.09), while groups 3 (OR 0.96, CI 0.94-0.99) and 4 (OR 0.93, CI 0.89-0.97) had decreased odds.
conclusionsThe method of risk adjustment drastically influences the direction of effect in health outcomes among dual users of VA and Medicare. These findings underscore the need for standardized and reliable risk adjustment methods that are not susceptible to measurement differences across different health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.