Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28462086›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2017

Predicting cognitive behavioral therapy response in social anxiety disorder with anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala during emotion regulation.

Heide Klumpp, Jacklynn M Fitzgerald, Kerry L Kinney, Amy E Kennedy, Stewart A Shankman, Scott A Langenecker, K Luan Phan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neurocircuitry of treatment in anxiety disorders.Biomarkers in neuropsychiatry · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Multidimensional imaging techniques for prediction of treatment response in major depressive disorder.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heide KlumppMood and Anxiety Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry (HK, AEK, SAL, KLP), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Psychology (HK, JMF, KLK, SAS, KLP), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States. Electronic address: hklumpp@psych.uic.edu.
Jacklynn M FitzgeraldDepartment of Psychology (HK, JMF, KLK, SAS, KLP), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Kerry L KinneyDepartment of Psychology (HK, JMF, KLK, SAS, KLP), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Amy E KennedyMood and Anxiety Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry (HK, AEK, SAL, KLP), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Mental Health Service (AEK, KLP), Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Stewart A ShankmanDepartment of Psychology (HK, JMF, KLK, SAS, KLP), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Scott A LangeneckerMood and Anxiety Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry (HK, AEK, SAL, KLP), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
K Luan PhanMood and Anxiety Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry (HK, AEK, SAL, KLP), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Psychology (HK, JMF, KLK, SAS, KLP), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Mental Health Service (AEK, KLP), Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
University of Illinois Chicago · USJesse Brown VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Strengthening Stakeholder Engagement in Human Research Protections.UL1TR002003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2016 to 2024
$33.7M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR029879 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MAZZONE, THEODORE · 2009 to 2011
$11.0M
Negative Valence Brain Targets and Predictors of Anxiety and Depression TreatmentR01MH101497 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI PHAN, K. LUAN · 2013 to 2016
$2.6M
Brain Mechanisms of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Social Anxiety DisorderK23MH093679 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KLUMPP, HEIDE · 2012 to 2016
$948k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002003NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029879NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH093679NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder (SAD) and other internalizing conditions attempts to improve emotion regulation. Accumulating data indicate anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and to a lesser extent amygdala, activation in various tasks predicts treatment outcome. However, little is known about ACC and amygdala activation to emotion regulation in predicting clinical improvement following CBT in SAD.

methodsBefore treatment, 38 SAD patients completed implicit and explicit emotion regulation paradigms during fMRI. Implicit regulation involved attentional control over negative distractors. Explicit regulation comprised cognitive reappraisal to negative images. Pre-CBT brain activity was circumscribed to anatomical-based ACC sub-regions (rostral, dorsal) and amygdala masks, which were submitted to ROC curves to examine predictive validity as well as correlational analysis to evaluate prognostic change in symptom severity.

resultsMore rostral (rACC) activity in implicit regulation and less rACC activity during explicit regulation distinguished responders (34%) from non-responders. Greater amygdala response in implicit regulation also foretold responder status. Baseline rACC and amygdala activity during attentional control correlated with pre-to-post CBT change in symptom severity such that more activation was related to greater decline in symptoms. No significant correlations were observed for explicit regulation.

conclusionsAcross forms of regulation, rACC activity predicted responder status whereas amygdala as a neuromarker was limited to implicit regulation. While the direction of effects (enhanced vs. reduced) in rACC activity was task-dependent, results suggest SAD patients with deficient regulation benefited more from CBT. Findings support previous studies involving patients with depression and suggest the rACC may be a viable marker of clinical improvement in SAD.

Indexed as

EmotionsAdultAmygdalaCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhobia, SocialPredictive Value of TestsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28462086
PMCPMC5403806
OpenAlexW2605768310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.