ArticlePeerJ2017
Cloning and evaluation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in
Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Genome-wide analysis of the Amorphophallus konjac AkCSLA gene family and its functional characterization in drought tolerance of transgenic arabidopsis.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Functional validation of AaCaM3 response to high temperature stress in Amorphophallus albus.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of buds transcriptome and identification of two florigen gene AkFTs in Amorphophallus konjac.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Scorpion primer PCR analysis for genotyping of allele variants of thiopurine s‑methyltransferase*3.Molecular medicine reports · 2020Article
- RNA-seq-based selection of reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis of pitaya.FEBS open bio · 2019Article
- Genetic expression profile-based screening of genes and pathways associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Selection and evaluation of reference genes for qRT-PCR analysis inPlant methods · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) has been widely used in the detection and quantification of gene expression levels because of its high accuracy, sensitivity, and reproducibility as well as its large dynamic range. However, the reliability and accuracy of RT-qPCR depends on accurate transcript normalization using stably expressed reference genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.