Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28461713›Full record

ArticleChildren and youth services review2017

The Great Recession and risk for child abuse and neglect.

William Schneider, Jane Waldfogel, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children and youth services review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Violence in the Great Recession.American journal of epidemiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William SchneiderNorthwestern University, 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208.
Jane WaldfogelColumbia University School of Social Work, 1255 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027; jw205@columbia.edu.
Jeanne Brooks-GunnTeachers College, Columbia University, 525 West 120th St. New York, NY 10027, jb224@columbia.edu.
Columbia University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Fragile Families and the Transition to AdulthoodR01HD036916 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Kathryn Edin, Jane Waldfogel · 1999 to 2026
$46.3M
Development CoreP2CHD058486 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Jennifer S Hirsch, Julien O Teitler · 2014 to 2026
$4.3M
Unemployment, the Great Recession, Fragile Families and Child DevelopmentR01HD066054 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GARFINKEL, IRWIN · 2011 to 2013
$1.6M
Columbia Population Research CenterR24HD058486 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GARFINKEL, IRWIN · 2009 to 2013
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058486NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD036916NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD066054NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD058486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the association between the Great Recession and four measures of the risk for maternal child abuse and neglect: (1) maternal physical aggression; (2) maternal psychological aggression; (3) physical neglect by mothers; and (4) supervisory/exposure neglect by mothers. It draws on rich longitudinal data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, a longitudinal birth cohort study of families in 20 U.S. cities (N = 3,177; 50% African American, 25% Hispanic; 22% non-Hispanic white; 3% other). The study collected information for the 9-year follow-up survey before, during, and after the Great Recession (2007-2010). Interview dates were linked to two macroeconomic measures of the Great Recession: the national Consumer Sentiment Index and the local unemployment rate. Also included are a wide range of socio-demographic controls, as well as city fixed effects and controls for prior parenting. Results indicate that the Great Recession was associated with increased risk of child abuse but decreased risk of child neglect. Households with social fathers present may have been particularly adversely affected. Results also indicate that economic uncertainty during the Great Recession, as measured by the Consumer Sentiment Index and the unemployment rate, had direct effects on the risk of abuse or neglect, which were not mediated by individual-level measures of economic hardship or poor mental health.

Indexed as

AbuseAggressionConsumer ConfidenceFragile FamiliesNeglectParentingUnemployment

Identifiers

PMID28461713
PMCPMC5408954
OpenAlexW2534599531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.