Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28461703›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Immunology2017

Does niche competition determine the origin of tissue-resident macrophages?

Martin Guilliams, Charlotte L Scott

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 249 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
249citing papers in PubMed
21.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

249 citing papers in PubMed, 390 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Monocytes in pneumonia: Functional plasticity and innate memory (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Effective macrophage clearance ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

189 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin GuilliamsLaboratory of Myeloid Cell Ontogeny and Functional Specialisation, VIB-UGhent Centre for Inflammation Research, Ghent 9052, Belgium; and the Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent 9052, Belgium.
Charlotte L ScottLaboratory of Myeloid Cell Ontogeny and Functional Specialisation, VIB-UGhent Centre for Inflammation Research, Ghent 9052, Belgium; and the Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent 9052, Belgium.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most tissue-resident macrophages are derived from embryonic precursors but, under certain circumstances, circulating monocytes can differentiate into self-maintaining tissue-resident macrophages that resemble their embryonic counterparts. In this Opinion article, we propose that distinct macrophage precursors have an almost identical potential to develop into resident macrophages but they compete for a restricted number of niches. The tight regulation of the niche ensures that monocytes do not differentiate into macrophages when the niche is full but that these cells can differentiate efficiently into macrophages when the niche is available. Imprinting by the niche would be the dominant factor conferring macrophage identity and self-maintenance capacity, rather than origin as was previously proposed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCellular MicroenvironmentHumansMacrophagesMonocytesOrgan Specificity

Identifiers

PMID28461703
OpenAlexW2611921452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.