Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28461440›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2017

Who is reducing their material consumption and why? A cross-cultural analysis of dematerialization behaviours.

Lorraine Whitmarsh, Stuart Capstick, Nicholas Nash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Industry 1.61803: the transition to an industry with reduced material demand fit for a low carbon future.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Article
  7. Demanding stories: television coverage of sustainability, climate change and material demand.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lorraine WhitmarshSchool of Psychology, and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK whitmarshle@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9054-1040
Stuart CapstickSchool of Psychology, and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK.
Nicholas NashSchool of Psychology, and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The environmental and economic imperatives to dematerialize economies, or 'do more with less', have been established for some years. Yet, to date, little is known about the personal drivers associated with dematerializing. This paper explores the prevalence and profile of those who are taking action to reduce consumption in different cultural contexts (UK and Brazil) and considers influences on dematerialization behaviours. We find that exemplar behaviours (avoiding buying new things and avoiding packaging) are far less common than archetypal environmental behaviours (e.g. recycling), but also that cultural context is important (Brazilians are more likely to reduce their material consumption than people in the UK). We also find that the two dematerialization behaviours are associated with different pro-environmental actions (more radical action versus green consumption, respectively); and have distinct, but overlapping, psychological (e.g. identity) and socio-demographic (e.g. education) predictors. Comparing a more traditional value-identity model of pro-environmental behaviour with a motivation-based (self-determination) model, we find that the latter explains somewhat more variance than the former. However, overall, little variance is explained, suggesting that additional factors at the personal and structural levels are important for determining these consumption behaviours. We conclude by outlining policy implications and avenues for further research.This article is part of the themed issue 'Material demand reduction'.

Indexed as

behaviourcross-culturaldematerializationidentityself-determinationvalues

Identifiers

PMID28461440
PMCPMC5415653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.