Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28461291›Full record

ArticleThe European respiratory journal2017

Perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on mHealth for asthma self-management.

Andrew J Simpson, Persijn J Honkoop, Erika Kennington, Jiska B Snoeck-Stroband, Ian Smith, Jessica East, Courtney Coleman, Ann Caress, Kian Fan Chung, Jacob K Sont and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European respiratory journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Tele-Monitoring Applications in Respiratory Allergy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Mobile Health for Asthma.CHEST pulmonary · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Digital tools in allergy and respiratory care.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew J SimpsonDivision of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK Andrew.Simpson-2@manchester.ac.uk.
Persijn J HonkoopDept of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Erika KenningtonAsthma UK, London, UK.
Jiska B Snoeck-StrobandDept of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Ian SmithDept of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jessica EastAsthma UK, London, UK.
Courtney ColemanAsthma UK, London, UK.
Ann CaressDivision of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Kian Fan ChungNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK.
Jacob K SontDept of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Omar UsmaniNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK.
Stephen J FowlerDivision of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAsthma UK · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile healthcare (mHealth) has the potential to revolutionise the self-management of long-term medical conditions such as asthma. A user-centred design is integral if mHealth is to be embraced by patients and healthcare professionals.The aim of this study was to determine the perspectives of individuals with asthma and healthcare professionals on the use of mHealth for asthma self-management.We used a sequential exploratory mixed methods design; focus groups informed the development of questionnaires, which were disseminated to individuals with asthma and healthcare professionals.Focus group participants (18 asthma patients and five healthcare professionals) identified 12 potential uses of mHealth. Questionnaire results showed that individuals with asthma (n=186) most frequently requested an mHealth system to monitor asthma over time (72%) and to collect data to present to healthcare teams (70%). In contrast, healthcare professionals (n=63) most frequently selected a system alerting patients to deteriorating asthma control (86%) and advising them when to seek medical attention (87%). Individuals with asthma were less likely than healthcare professionals (p<0.001) to believe that assessing medication adherence and inhaler technique could improve asthma control.Our data provide strong support for mHealth for asthma self-management, but highlight fundamental differences between the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelSelf-ManagementAdultAsthmaEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicNetherlandsSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28461291
OpenAlexW2600968423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.