Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28461225›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2017

Bioelectrical brain effects of one's own voice identification in pitch of voice auditory feedback.

Oleg Korzyukov, Alexander Bronder, Yunseon Lee, Sona Patel, Charles R Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Altered Timing of Self-Voice Processing in Parkinson's Disease.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oleg KorzyukovDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Dr., Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Neuromagnetic Brain Imaging Laboratory, Meadowlands Medical Center, 55 Meadowlands Parkway, Secaucus, NJ 07094, USA. Electronic address: okorzyukov@meadowlandshospital.org.
Alexander BronderDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Dr., Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Yunseon LeeDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Dr., Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Sona PatelDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Seton Hall University, 400 South Orange Ave, South Orange, NJ 07079, USA.
Charles R LarsonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Dr., Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Northwestern University · USSeton Hall University · US

Funding

Sensory Mechanisms of Voice ControlR01DC006243 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LARSON, CHARLES R · 2004 to 2013
$4.6M
Understanding the Voice Control System in Parkinson's DiseaseR03DC013883 · NIDCD · SETON HALL UNIVERSITY · PI PATEL, SONA · 2014 to 2016
$383k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006243NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of voice fundamental frequency (F0) relies in part on comparison of the intended F0 level and auditory feedback. This comparison impacts "sense of agency", or SoA, commonly defined as being the agent of one's own actions and plays a key role for self-awareness and social interactions. SoA is aberrant in several psychiatric disorders. Knowledge about brain activity reflecting SoA can be used in clinical practice for these disorders. It was shown that perception of voice feedback as one's own voice, reflecting the recognition of SoA, alters auditory sensory processing. Using a voice perturbation paradigm we contrasted vocal and bioelectrical brain responses to auditory stimuli that differed in magnitude: 100 and 400 cents. Results suggest the different magnitudes were perceived as a pitch error in self-vocalization (100 cents) or as a pitch shift generated externally (400 cents). Vocalizations and neural responses to changes in pitch of self-vocalization were defined as those made to small magnitude pitch-shifts (100 cents) and which did not show differential neural responses to upward versus downward changes in voice pitch auditory feedback. Vocal responses to large magnitude pitch shifts (400 cents) were smaller than those made to small pitch shifts, and neural responses differed according to upwards versus downward changes in pitch. Our results suggest that the presence of SoA for self-produced sounds may modify bioelectrical brain responses reflecting differences in auditory processing of the direction of a pitch shift. We suggest that this modification of bioelectrical response can be used as a biological index of SoA. Possible neuronal mechanisms of this modification of bioelectrical brain response are discussed.

Indexed as

Self ConceptAcoustic StimulationAnalysis of VarianceBrainElectroencephalographyFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMalePitch PerceptionSpeech PerceptionYoung AdultAgencyAuditory processingERPPitch changeVoice

Identifiers

PMID28461225
PMCPMC5542569
OpenAlexW2609198907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.