Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28460659›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Tuberculosis innovations mean little if they cannot save lives.

Madhukar Pai, Jennifer Furin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antibiotic Resistance toAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Asia emerges as a hotbed of diagnostic innovations for tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advances in Molecular Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020
    Review
  18. Improving quality is necessary to building a TB-free world: Lancet Commission on Tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Implementation of XpertPublic health action · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Madhukar PaiMcGill Global Health Programs and McGill International Tuberculosis Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3667-4536
Jennifer FurinDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has seen the emergence of new diagnostics and drugs for tuberculosis, a disease that kills over 1.8 million people each year. However, these new tools are yet to reach scale, and access remains a major challenge for patients in low and middle income countries. Urgent action is needed if we are committed to ending the TB epidemic. This means raising the level of ambition, embracing innovation, increasing financial investments, addressing implementation gaps, and ensuring that new technologies reach those who need them to survive. Otherwise, the promise of innovative technologies will never be realized.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAntitubercular AgentsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansTuberculosisAntitubercular Agentsdiagnosticsdrugsepidemiologyglobal healthinfectious diseasemicrobiologytuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID28460659
PMCPMC5413344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.