Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28460196›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genomics and human genetics2017

A Robust Framework for Microbial Archaeology.

Christina Warinner, Alexander Herbig, Allison Mann, James A Fellows Yates, Clemens L Weiß, Hernán A Burbano, Ludovic Orlando, Johannes Krause

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Oral Microbiome of King Richard III of England.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Pathogen prospecting of museums: Reconstructing malaria epidemiology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christina WarinnerDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07745, Germany; email: warinner@shh.mpg.de.
Alexander HerbigDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07745, Germany; email: warinner@shh.mpg.de.
Allison MannDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07745, Germany; email: warinner@shh.mpg.de.
James A Fellows YatesDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07745, Germany; email: warinner@shh.mpg.de.
Clemens L WeißResearch Group for Ancient Genomics and Evolution, Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
Hernán A BurbanoResearch Group for Ancient Genomics and Evolution, Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
Ludovic OrlandoCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Johannes KrauseDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07745, Germany; email: warinner@shh.mpg.de.

Funding

Microbial Ecologies of Indigenous CommunitiesR01GM089886 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI LAWSON, PAUL ALAN, LEWIS, CECIL M · 2011 to 2019
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial archaeology is flourishing in the era of high-throughput sequencing, revealing the agents behind devastating historical plagues, identifying the cryptic movements of pathogens in prehistory, and reconstructing the ancestral microbiota of humans. Here, we introduce the fundamental concepts and theoretical framework of the discipline, then discuss applied methodologies for pathogen identification and microbiome characterization from archaeological samples. We give special attention to the process of identifying, validating, and authenticating ancient microbes using high-throughput DNA sequencing data. Finally, we outline standards and precautions to guide future research in the field.

Indexed as

ArchaeaArchaeologyBacteriaDNA, AncientGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialHumansMetagenomicsMicrobiotaSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Ancientancient DNAbacteriahigh-throughput sequencingmetagenomicsmicrobiologymicrobiomepathogens

Identifiers

PMID28460196
PMCPMC5581243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.