Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28460076›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

The effect of increasing numbers of repeats on TAL effector DNA binding specificity.

Fabio C Rinaldi, Lindsey A Doyle, Barry L Stoddard, Adam J Bogdanove

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tuning up Transcription Factors for Therapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. PthA4Molecular plant pathology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio C RinaldiPlant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Lindsey A DoyleDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research, Seattle, WA 98019, USA.
Barry L StoddardDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research, Seattle, WA 98019, USA.
Adam J BogdanovePlant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Cornell University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

MegaTALS: hyperspecific reagents for targeted gene modification and correctionR01GM105691 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI STODDARD, BARRY L. · 2014 to 2022
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) recognize their DNA targets via tandem repeats, each specifying a single nucleotide base in a one-to-one sequential arrangement. Due to this modularity and their ability to bind long DNA sequences with high specificity, TALEs have been used in many applications. Contributions of individual repeat-nucleotide associations to affinity and specificity have been characterized. Here, using in vitro binding assays, we examined the relationship between the number of repeats in a TALE and its affinity, for both target and non-target DNA. Each additional repeat provides extra binding energy for the target DNA, with the gain decaying exponentially such that binding energy saturates. Affinity for non-target DNA also increases non-linearly with the number of repeats, but with a slower decay of gain. The difference between the effect of length on affinity for target versus non-target DNA manifests in specificity increasing then diminishing with increasing TALE length, peaking between 15 and 19 repeats. Modeling across different hypothetical saturation levels and rates of gain decay, reflecting different repeat compositions, yielded a similar range of specificity optima. This range encompasses the mean and median length of native TALEs, suggesting that these proteins as a group have evolved for maximum specificity.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBase SequenceBinding SitesDNA, BacterialProtein BindingTandem Repeat SequencesThermodynamicsTranscription Activator-Like EffectorsXanthomonasBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialTranscription Activator-Like Effectors

Identifiers

PMID28460076
PMCPMC5499867
OpenAlexW2609941284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.