ArticleAnnals of botany2017
The genetic architecture of UV floral patterning in sunflower.
Article in Annals of botany, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Basis of UV Bullseye Size Variations in Turnip Rape (Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera).Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Bees, flowers and UV.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2025Review
- Evolution of petal patterning: blooming floral diversity at the microscale.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- A guide to sunflowers: floral resource nutrition for bee health and key pollination syndromes.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- The Ecology of Hybrid Incompatibilities.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- UV reflectance in crop remote sensing: Assessing the current state of knowledge and extending research with strawberry cultivars.PloS one · 2024Review
- Fade into you: genetic control of pigmentation patterns in red-flesh apple (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- CYCLOIDEA-like genes control floral symmetry, floral orientation, and nectar guide patterning.The Plant cell · 2023Article
- Why do sunflowers have invisible colors?eLife · 2022Article
- Article
- Floral UV Features of Plant Species From a Neotropical Savanna.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Spatially explicit depiction of a floral epiphytic bacterial community reveals role for environmental filtering within petals.MicrobiologyOpen · 2021Article
- Cell number explains the intraspecific spur-length variation in anPlant diversity · 2019Article
- Neo-Domestication of an Interspecific TetraploidGenes · 2018Article
- The genetic architecture of UV floral patterning in sunflower.Annals of botany · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The patterning of floral ultraviolet (UV) pigmentation varies both intra- and interspecifically in sunflowers and many other plant species, impacts pollinator attraction, and can be critical to reproductive success and crop yields. However, the genetic basis for variation in UV patterning is largely unknown. This study examines the genetic architecture for proportional and absolute size of the UV bullseye in Helianthus argophyllus , a close relative of the domesticated sunflower. Methods: A camera modified to capture UV light (320-380 nm) was used to phenotype floral UV patterning in an F 2 mapping population, then quantitative trait loci (QTL) were identified using genotyping-by-sequencing and linkage mapping. The ability of these QTL to predict the UV patterning of natural population individuals was also assessed. Key Results: Proportional UV pigmentation is additively controlled by six moderate effect QTL that are predictive of this phenotype in natural populations. In contrast, UV bullseye size is controlled by a single large effect QTL that also controls flowerhead size and co-localizes with a major flowering time QTL in Helianthus . Conclusions: The co-localization of the UV bullseye size QTL, flowerhead size QTL and a previously known flowering time QTL may indicate a single highly pleiotropic locus or several closely linked loci, which could inhibit UV bullseye size from responding to selection without change in correlated characters. The genetic architecture of proportional UV pigmentation is relatively simple and different from that of UV bullseye size, and so should be able to respond to natural or artificial selection independently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.