Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28459929›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2017

Behavioral Approach to Appropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing in Hospitals: The Dutch Unique Method for Antimicrobial Stewardship (DUMAS) Participatory Intervention Study.

Jonne J Sikkens, Michiel A van Agtmael, Edgar J G Peters, Kamilla D Lettinga, Martijn van der Kuip, Christina M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Cordula Wagner, Mark H H Kramer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Excellence in Antibiotic Stewardship: A Mixed-Methods Study Comparing High-, Medium-, and Low-Performing Hospitals.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Antimicrobial stewardship experience in paediatrics: first-year activity report.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jonne J SikkensDepartment of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Michiel A van AgtmaelDepartment of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Edgar J G PetersDepartment of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kamilla D LettingaDepartment of Internal Medicine, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martijn van der KuipDepartment of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Christina M J E Vandenbroucke-GraulsDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cordula WagnerEMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mark H H KramerDepartment of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLOLVG · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing leads to antimicrobial resistance and suboptimal clinical outcomes. Changing antimicrobial prescribing is a complex behavioral process that is not often taken into account in antimicrobial stewardship programs. Objective: To examine whether an antimicrobial stewardship approach grounded in behavioral theory and focusing on preserving prescriber autonomy and participation is effective in improving appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Dutch Unique Method for Antimicrobial Stewardship (DUMAS) study was a prospective, stepped-wedge, participatory intervention study performed from October 1, 2011, through December 31, 2015. Outcomes were measured during a baseline period of 16 months and an intervention period of 12 months. The study was performed at 7 clinical departments (2 medical, 3 surgical, and 2 pediatric) in a tertiary care medical center and a general teaching hospital in the Netherlands. Physicians prescribing systemic antimicrobial drugs for any indication for patients admitted to the participating departments during the study period were included in the study. Interventions: We offered prescribers a free choice of how to improve their antimicrobial prescribing. Prescribers were stimulated to choose interventions with higher potential for success based on a root cause analysis of inappropriate prescribing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Appropriateness of antimicrobial prescriptions was determined using a validated approach based on guideline adherence and motivated guideline deviation and measured with repeated point prevalence surveys (6 per year). Appropriateness judgment was masked for the study period. Antimicrobial consumption was extracted from pharmacy records and measured as days of therapy per admission. We used linear and logistic mixed-model regression analysis to model outcomes over time. Results: A total of 1121 patient cases with 700 antimicrobial prescriptions were assessed during the baseline period and 882 patient cases with 531 antimicrobial prescriptions during the intervention period. The mean antimicrobial appropriateness increased from 64.1% at intervention start to 77.4% at 12-month follow-up (+13.3%; relative risk, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.27), without a change in slope. No decrease in antimicrobial consumption was found. Conclusions and Relevance: Use of a behavioral approach preserving prescriber autonomy resulted in an increase in antimicrobial appropriateness sustained for at least 12 months. The approach is inexpensive and could be easily transferable to various health care environments.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBacterial InfectionsInappropriate PrescribingAnti-Infective AgentsChoice BehaviorDrug Resistance, MicrobialGuideline AdherenceHospitalsHumansMedication Therapy ManagementNetherlandsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prospective StudiesQuality ImprovementAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID28459929
PMCPMC5818788
OpenAlexW2611109940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.