Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28459873›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

The effect of cognitive-based training for the healthy older people: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Huei-Ling Chiu, Hsin Chu, Jui-Chen Tsai, Doresses Liu, Ying-Ren Chen, Hui-Ling Yang, Kuei-Ru Chou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04835909 (Effectiveness on Cognition of a Cognitive Training Intervention Based on Modern Board and Card Games in Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04835909 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness on Cognition of a Cognitive Training Intervention Based on Modern Board and Card Games in Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrain In Game scientific-technical serviceRan2021 to 2024Enrolled112ConditionsCognitive Impairment, MildArmsModern board and card games group, Paper and pencil tasks group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. An 18-month multimodal intervention trial for preventing dementia: J-MINT PRIME Tamba.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Huei-Ling ChiuSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsin ChuGangshan Branch of Armed Forces Kaohsiung General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Jui-Chen TsaiSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Doresses LiuSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ying-Ren ChenDepartment of Nursing, Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hui-Ling YangSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kuei-Ru ChouSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4882-3503
Taipei Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWTaoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital · TWTri-Service General Hospital · TWWan Fang Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrom the perspective of disease prevention, the enhancement of cognitive function among the healthy older people has become an important issue in many countries lately. This study aim to investigate the effect of cognitive-based training on the overall cognitive function, memory, attention, executive function, and visual-spatial ability of the healthy older people.

methodsCochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL of selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and previous systematic reviews were searched for eligible studies. The population focused on this study were healthy older people who participated in randomized controlled trials that investigated the effectiveness of cognitive-based training. The outcomes including change in overall cognitive function, memory, attention, executive function, and visual-spatial ability.

resultsWe collected a total of 31 RCTs, the results showed that cognitive-based training has a moderate effect on overall cognitive function (g = 0.419; 95%CI = 0.205-0.634) and executive function (g = 0.420; 95%CI = 0.239-0.602), and a small effect on the memory (g = 0.354; 95%CI = 0.244-0.465), attention (g = 0.218; 95%CI = 0.125-0.311), and visual-spatial ability (g = 0.183;95%CI = 0.015-0.352) in healthy older people. Subgroup analysis indicated the intervention characteristics of ≧3 times each week (p = 0.042), ≧8 total training weeks (p = 0.003) and ≧24 total training sessions (p = 0.040) yields a greater effect size.

conclusionsCognitive-based training is effective for the healthy older people. This improvement can represent a clinically important benefit, provide information about the use of cognitive-based training in healthy older people, and help the healthy older people obtain the greatest possible benefit in health promotion and disease prevention.

Indexed as

CognitionAgedAgingCognition DisordersHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID28459873
PMCPMC5411084
OpenAlexW2611016011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.