Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28459836›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Responsiveness of a simple tool for assessing change in behavioral intention after continuing professional development activities.

France Légaré, Adriana Freitas, Stéphane Turcotte, Francine Borduas, André Jacques, Francesca Luconi, Gaston Godin, Andrée Boucher, Joan Sargeant, Michel Labrecque

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06425692 (Enhancing Palliative Care in ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06425692 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing Palliative Care in ICU (EPIC) - Work Package 3

TypeinterventionalSponsorHeinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfRan2024 to 2029Enrolled500ConditionsICU, Staff Attitude, Learning, Palliative Care, Patient CareArmsEducation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Experience and Influence of Lifestyle RedesignCanadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

France LégaréCHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Adriana FreitasCHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Stéphane TurcotteCHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Francine BorduasOffice of the Vice-Dean of Education and Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
André JacquesAdvisor in Continuing Professional Development, Saint-Adolphe-d'Howard, Quebec, Canada.
Francesca LuconiContinuing Health Professional Education Office, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Gaston GodinFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Andrée BoucherCentre de pédagogie appliquée aux sciences de la santé, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Joan SargeantDivision of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Michel LabrecqueCHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuing professional development (CPD) activities are one way that new knowledge can be translated into changes in practice. However, few tools are available for evaluating the extent to which these activities change health professionals' behavior. We developed a questionnaire called CPD-Reaction for assessing the impact of CPD activities on health professionals' clinical behavioral intentions. We evaluated its responsiveness to change in behavioral intention and verified its acceptability among stakeholders. METHODS AND

findingsWe enrolled 376 health professionals who completed CPD-Reaction before and immediately after attending a CPD activity. We contacted them three months later and asked them to self-report on any behavior change. We compared the mean rankings on each CPD-Reaction construct before and immediately after CPD activities. To estimate its predictive validity, we compared the median behavioral intention score (post-activity) of health professionals reporting a behavior change three months later with the median behavioral intention score of physicians who reported no change. We explored stakeholders' views on CPD-Reaction in semi-structured interviews. Participants were mostly family physicians (62.2%), with an average of 19 years of clinical practice. Post-activity, we observed an increase in intention-related scores for all constructs (P < 0.001) with the most appreciable for the construct beliefs about capabilities. A total of 313 participants agreed to be contacted at follow up, and of these only 69 (22%) reported back. Of these, 43 (62%) self-reported a behavior change. We observed no statistically significant difference in intention between health professionals who later reported a behavior change and those who reported no change (P = 0.30). Overall, CPD stakeholders found the CPD-Reaction questionnaire of interest and suggested potential solutions to perceived barriers to its implementation.

conclusionThe CPD-Reaction questionnaire seems responsive to change in behavioral intention. Although CPD stakeholders found it interesting, future implementation will require addressing barriers they identified.

Indexed as

BehaviorEducation, Medical, ContinuingIntentionSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28459836
PMCPMC5411052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.