Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28459563›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2017

How Much Will It Cost To Monitor Microbial Drinking Water Quality in Sub-Saharan Africa?

Caroline Delaire, Rachel Peletz, Emily Kumpel, Joyce Kisiangani, Robert Bain, Ranjiv Khush

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MonitoringMicromachines · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline DelaireThe Aquaya Institute , PO Box 21862, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8359-6847
Rachel PeletzThe Aquaya Institute , PO Box 21862, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9256-0800
Emily KumpelThe Aquaya Institute , PO Box 21862, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-8441
Joyce KisianganiThe Aquaya Institute , PO Box 21862, Nairobi, Kenya.
Robert BainDivision of Data, Research and Policy, UNICEF , 3 UN Plaza, New York, New York 10017, United States.
Ranjiv KhushThe Aquaya Institute , 12 E Sir Francis Drake Blvd, Suite E, Larkspur, California 94939 United States.
Kenya Agricultural Research Institute · KEEarthquake Engineering Research Institute · USUnited Nations Children's Fund · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial water quality monitoring is crucial for managing water resources and protecting public health. However, institutional testing activities in sub-Saharan Africa are currently limited. Because the economics of water quality testing are poorly understood, the extent to which cost may be a barrier to monitoring in different settings is unclear. This study used cost data from 18 African monitoring institutions (piped water suppliers and health surveillance agencies in six countries) and estimates of water supply type coverage from 15 countries to assess the annual financial requirements for microbial water testing at both national and regional levels, using World Health Organization recommendations for sampling frequency. We found that a microbial water quality test costs 21.0 ± 11.3 USD, on average, including consumables, equipment, labor, and logistics, which is higher than previously calculated. Our annual cost estimates for microbial monitoring of piped supplies and improved point sources ranged between 8 000 USD for Equatorial Guinea and 1.9 million USD for Ethiopia, depending primarily on the population served but also on the distribution of piped water system sizes. A comparison with current national water and sanitation budgets showed that the cost of implementing prescribed testing levels represents a relatively modest proportion of existing budgets (<2%). At the regional level, we estimated that monitoring the microbial quality of all improved water sources in sub-Saharan Africa would cost 16.0 million USD per year, which is minimal in comparison to the projected annual capital costs of achieving Sustainable Development Goal 6.1 of safe water for all (14.8 billion USD).

Indexed as

Drinking WaterSanitationEthiopiaHumansWater QualityWater SupplyDrinking Water

Identifiers

PMID28459563
PMCPMC5463268
OpenAlexW2610613190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.