Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28459048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2017

HIV Point-of-Care Testing in Canadian Settings: A Scoping Review.

Alexa Minichiello, Michelle Swab, Meck Chongo, Zack Marshall, Jacqueline Gahagan, Allison Maybank, Aurélie Hot, Michael Schwandt, Sonia Gaudry, Oliver Hurley and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pharmacist-delivered HIV point-of-care testing in Ontario: Lessons learned from the GetaTest pilot.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Performance evaluation of the MedMira reveal G4 LAB S/P and POC HIV antibody rapid screening tests using plasma and whole blood specimens.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Point-of-care testing for HIV.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexa MinichielloCentre for REACH in HIV/AIDS, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michelle SwabHealth Sciences Library, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Meck ChongoSchool of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.
Zack MarshallDivision of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Jacqueline GahaganHealth Promotion Division, Faculty of Health Professions, School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Allison MaybankCenter for Rural Health Studies, Primary Health Care Research Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Aurélie HotCoalition des organismes communautaires québécois de lutte contre le sida, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Michael SchwandtFaculty of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Sonia GaudryCIHR Centre for REACH in HIV/AIDS and CIHR CBR Collaborative: A Program of REACH, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Oliver HurleyCenter for Rural Health Studies, Primary Health Care Research Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Shabnam AsghariCenter for Rural Health Studies, Primary Health Care Research Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV point-of-care testing (POCT) was approved for use in Canada in 2005 and provides important public health benefits by providing rapid screening results rather than sending a blood sample to a laboratory and waiting on test results. Access to test results soon after testing (or during the same visit) is believed to increase the likelihood that individuals will receive their results and improve access to confirmatory testing and linkages to care. This paper reviews the literature on the utilization of HIV POCT across Canadian provinces.

methodsWe searched OVID Medline, Embase, EBM Reviews, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and 20 electronic grey literature databases. All empirical studies investigating HIV POCT programs in Canada published in French or English were included.

resultsSearches of academic databases identified a total of 6,091 records. After removing duplicates and screening for eligibility, 27 records were included. Ten studies are peer-reviewed articles, and 17 are grey literature reports. HIV POCT in Canada is both feasible and accepted by Canadians. It is preferred to conventional HIV testing (ranging from 81.1 to 97%), and users are highly satisfied with the testing process (ranging between 96 and 100%).

conclusionThe majority of studies demonstrate that HIV POCT is feasible, preferred, and accepted by diverse populations in Canada. Losses to follow-up and linkage rates are also good. However, more research is needed to understand how best to scale up HIV POCT in contexts that currently have very limited or no access to testing.

Indexed as

CanadaHIVpoint-of-care testingscoping reviewutilization

Identifiers

PMID28459048
PMCPMC5394765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.