ArticleTropical parasitology
Detection of
Article in Tropical parasitology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coproantigen detection and molecular identification of Cryptosporidium species among newborn and adult farm animals.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Review
- Comparison of four diagnostic techniques forQatar medical journal · 2025Article
- Effective Laboratory Diagnosis of Parasitic Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Where, When, How, and What Should We Look For?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Anti-Cryptosporidium oocysts polyclonal antibodies for cryptosporidiosis diagnosis and protection.AMB Express · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Toluidine Blue Stain for Direct Wet Mount Detection ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multicenter Evaluation of an ELISA for the Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Review
- Detection ofThe Korean journal of parasitology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMATERIALS AND
methodsThe patients in this study were divided into two groups: one group was immunocompromised patients (
resultsTotally, 4 (5.4%) of 73 patients of the study group were positive for
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.